I'm back chaps.
I got the test papers back and they're are quite crap. I don't understand why I made the errors I did. Even then, some of the marking seems quite strict and very confusing.
I got 4 out of 6 marks for describing how to use an oscilloscope - now, seeing as I use one nearly every day, I would have thought I would have got a better mark - looking at my answer now, I still can't think of anything I haven't mentioned short of "turn it on".
Also, there's absolute nonsense with calculations on parts of it - for example, I didn't get any marks for a couple of questions because I didn't draw lines to show the points where I got the gradient - nevermind that I actually used maths and got the correct gradient.
Anyhow, back into the swing of things, so I plan to do some more tinkering. I want to get back with uC's, so I'll dig out the boards and books.
Keep an eye out.
Sparky
I got the test papers back and they're are quite crap. I don't understand why I made the errors I did. Even then, some of the marking seems quite strict and very confusing.
I got 4 out of 6 marks for describing how to use an oscilloscope - now, seeing as I use one nearly every day, I would have thought I would have got a better mark - looking at my answer now, I still can't think of anything I haven't mentioned short of "turn it on".
Also, there's absolute nonsense with calculations on parts of it - for example, I didn't get any marks for a couple of questions because I didn't draw lines to show the points where I got the gradient - nevermind that I actually used maths and got the correct gradient.
Anyhow, back into the swing of things, so I plan to do some more tinkering. I want to get back with uC's, so I'll dig out the boards and books.
Keep an eye out.
Sparky