This is an interesting one. I don't know if you could actually DO this physically. Under longitudinal pressure waves, you could solve this along the X axis using the one dimensional wave equation...but that would involve a SINUSOIDAL, not a LINEAR density distribution. Once the disturbing force that CREATED this distribution is gone, equilibrium would tend to set in, once the initial oscillation is damped.If the gas particles in a box are uniformly distributed in the y and z directions, and linearly distributed in the x direction, is it true that the concentration won't change with time, according to the diffusion equation? I find this very unintuitive.
Presumably you are studying Ficks law, which states:
'The rate of change of concentration is proportional to the second derivative of concentration with respect to distance.'
The second derivative of any linear function is zero so the rate of change of concentration is zero.
And of course the second derivatives in the directions of constant concentration are also zero.
Nope, Ficks law connects distance and time.However, this is an unstable condition with respect to TIME.
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|difference between diffusion and ion Implantation||General Electronics Chat||13|
|H||Semiconductors: MOSFET help w/ diffusion and drift current||Homework Help||0|
|B||Drug diffusion||Homework Help||0|
|I||Q: CMOS/Diffusion Resistor||Analog & Mixed-Signal Design||1|
|B||Diffusion in a trap||General Science, Physics & Math||3|
by Jake Hertz
by Luke James