People's needs/wants are different. Personally, I'll forego the analog scope because, overall, I like digital scopes better for my needs. If I really need one I'll get out the Phillips scope I bought in the 70's.I don't know why people don't buy an old analog oscilloscope.
Most I2C I use is 400kHz, which would round the corners off a lot; you wouldn't be able to see potential rise time issues (the scope would be creating its own, you might think you have a problem that isn't there.)I'm only really starting out so this will do me just fine. I like the hackability of the tool as well as the fact that source code and schematics are available. If there's a simple bug I can fix it myself without having to resort to posting it off.
Also, why couldn't I analyse I2C? Its data rate is only in the 100s of kbps. Sure, the corners might be rounded but I'd certainly see the fundamental frequencies with 1MHz
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|Buying load resistor for lab||Test & Measurement||12|
|This Christmas I'm thinking about buying my grandson an Erector Set.||Off-Topic||13|
|Bad year to be buying semiconductors||General Electronics Chat||19|
|First Oscilloscope Advice- Keysight DSOX1204G vs. Rigol MSO5074||Test & Measurement||11|
|A||How to choose a Buzzer for a wall current detector, when buying?||Test & Measurement||6|
by Jake Hertz
by Jeff Child
by Jake Hertz