Some of you members seem like those that back in 1543 said that Copernicus was wrong. Just because our very young human race hasn't found our way into the rest of the universe doesn't mean that other more sophisticated beings haven't been able to do it.

Before the naysayers chime in, don't forget Earth is only 4.5 billion years old compared to the universes 13.8 billion years. https://www.ips-planetarium.org/page/age

 

Some of you members seem like those that back in 1543 said that Copernicus was wrong. Just because our very young human race hasn't found our way into the rest of the universe doesn't mean that other more sophisticated beings haven't been able to do it.

Before the naysayers chime in, don't forget Earth is only 4.5 billion years old compared to the universes 13.8 billion years. https://www.ips-planetarium.org/page/age

I think there are other species in the universe and maybe some have wasted their time visiting here but that's a separate thing from believing in obvious fakes or mistaken identity to Alien craft due to sensor image processing artifacts, EM effects or being fooled by false perspective speed and motions effects on weapons pod videos.

 

Aliens already visited but they couldn't find any intelligence here on Earth. So they just moved on to the next galaxy.

 

Aliens already visited but they couldn't find any intelligence here on Earth. So they just moved on to the next galaxy.

Some aliens are still visiting while pretending to be human.


No humans could be this stupid, it has to be explained by alien unfamiliarity with earth.

 

No humans could be this stupid...

You are such an optimist!

 

mistaken identity to Alien craft due to sensor image processing artifacts, EM effects or being fooled by false perspective speed and motions effects on weapons pod videos.

You've said before that the "tic tac" videos are artifacts of commercial aircraft. Can you explain why the ship radar and the weapons pods didn't show any "squawk codes" of the so called commercial planes? And what commercial plane could or would fly so close the the ocean surface and then go under the surface?

While I agree most of the photos and videos can be fake I don't think military videos would be faked.

 

You've said before that the "tic tac" videos are artifacts of commercial aircraft. Can you explain why the ship radar and the weapons pods didn't show any "squawk codes" of the so called commercial planes? And what commercial plane could or would fly so close the the ocean surface and then go under the surface?

While I agree most of the photos and videos can be fake I don't think military videos would be faked.

Why would I give you even old details about weapons systems and IFF systems? Do a tiny bit of work and look it up. That's why pilots and casual observers, that have no clue about how those things work, are usually ones thinking they are see something strange and unexplained. I've seen lots a strange things on radar and signals systems returns showing, 'impossible' things, not once did we think it was an actual alien UFO.

It's so obvious this is a bokeh.

Looks like an Aerostat to me. These floating devices have radar targets inside to make them easy to detect.

 

@nsaspook , you know it's OK to just say you don't know. Non of the videos even come anywhere close to answering my questions. I did do some research and no one or no site says that "squawk numbers" aren't shown on military radar. Not showing them could be very dangerous, getting a airliner shot down by accident. does flight 800 ring a bell? The explanation for that doesn't ring true.

 

@nsaspook , you know it's OK to just say you don't know. Non of the videos even come anywhere close to answering my questions. I did do some research and no one or no site says that "squawk numbers" aren't shown on military radar. Not showing them could be very dangerous, getting a airliner shot down by accident. does flight 800 ring a bell? The explanation for that doesn't ring true.

Flight 800? Please, that's a conspiracy nuts dream.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...h-anniversary-conspiracy-theories/7830073002/

A much closer incident was the Iran airliner shoot-down by the US.

16:00 gives some info about IFF and squawk codes that can be easily spoofed.

The best machines, sensors and systems are only as good as the people that use that data. I'm very familiar with how dangerous that can be. These UFO incidents are nowhere close to that.

What does ring true. Alien UFO's with flashing red, green standard aircraft lights on a normal flight path or actual airplanes distorted by out of focus night vision? Alien UFO's going super fast on the surface or simple trigonometry using the data on the screen showing this is a sensor target stabilization effect?
Yes, I do know (having actual experience in the field) and didn't say anything about military radars, threat display or indications.

I'm not you. You believe in this nonsense, I don't, it's pretty easy to understand, nothing will answer your questions if you have faith in this nonsense.

You know it's OK to just say you've been mislead into thinking this garbage is real..

 

You wouldn't believe if they landed in your back yard.

 

You wouldn't believe if they landed in your back yard.

OK, so as usually, you've got nothing.

Sure I would believe. Calling all Hot Aliens, please land in my back yard.

 

OK, so as usually, you've got nothing.

As usual you make claims with little evidence. for every "expert" you birin in your Youtubr videos there are as many or more giving the other side view. Your claim that you know UAP's or UFO's don't exist or can't exist is in the grand scheme of things is just you opinion, just like my opinion that they do. There are way too many things in archaeology that can't be explained by any other means, and since they can't be explained they mostly hidden in the back rooms of museum collections.