Assuming the "Curr" value represents the number of samples in memory, I'm guessing it took a little over 23 minutes to figure out the frequency. Though, with only 1.4 periods to go on, I'm not inclined to believe the given μHz resolution.. . . it's a long wait but. . .
It matches the function generator's setting, and one the next sample set was a couple of counts under.Assuming the "Curr" value represents the number of samples in memory, I'm guessing it took a little over 23 minutes to figure out the frequency. Though, with only 1.4 periods to go on, I'm not inclined to believe the given μHz resolution.
Indeed, but the given resolution implies 10 μHz precision, e.g., that a change of 0.01 mHz is significant.Oh, by the way, that's millihertz, not microhertz.
by Aaron Carman
by Duane Benson