thingmaker3,
Ratch
I beg your pardon? Look at post #26 of this thread where you yourself say the following; "I think we've already decided amongst ourselves that they are the same. We've only got one hold-out." What were you talking about as being the same?Quote:
Your logical fallicy is called "the straw man argument." Nobody here claimed "phasor" was a substitution for "vector." The term "sub category" does not mean the same thing as "substitute."
I could ask you the same question. Did you not call phasors and vectors the same thing?I'm curios: what is your native language?
Even a casual reading of this thread show that we are still in disagreement. Did you not read what author Krase says about phasors and vectors? Did you not understand my enumeration of the differences between them?And you DO agree with me. You just call it something else.
Ratch