Typo in "Amplifiers and Active Devices" Chapter

Discussion in 'Feedback and Suggestions' started by BHijazi, Jan 26, 2010.

  1. BHijazi

    Thread Starter New Member

    Jan 16, 2010
    5
    0
    Dears,

    I think there is a typo in the attenuaters section at: http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_3/chpt_1/7.html

    in the "T-section attenuator" description, the equation for calculating Z: Z=RO + (R2 ||(R1 + Z))

    I think RO should be replaced by R1

    Thanks,
    Basel
     
  2. Wendy

    Moderator

    Mar 24, 2008
    20,765
    2,536
    There is a problem, but it is with the designations. R0 is Rout, not R (zero). And RI is Rin, not R1.

    Under this drawing...

    [​IMG]

    The paragraph above the formula also seems to have a problem.

    ****************
    OK, looked at it again. Changed my description of the problem.

    I would change the designations to Rin and Rout, it would be much more obvious, and not be mistaken for numbers.
     
    Last edited: Jan 26, 2010
  3. Dcrunkilton

    E-book Co-ordinator

    Jul 31, 2004
    416
    11
    Thanks for pointing out the discrepancy.

    This is the change I am making to the copy at ibiblio:

    Disconnecting the source and looking in to the right at VI, we need to see a series parallel combination of R1, R2, R1, and Z looking like an equivalent resistance of ZIN, the same as the ource/load impedance Z: (a load of Z is connected to the output.)
    ZIN = R1 + (R2 ||(R1 + Z)) ​
    For example, substitute the 10 dB values from the 50 Ω attenuator table for R1 and R2 as shown in Figure below.
    ZIN = 25.97 + (35.14 ||(25.97 + 50)) ​
    ZIN = 25.97 + (35.14 || 75.97 ) ​
    ZIN = 25.97 + 24.03 = 50 ​
     
Loading...