Paul,
This forum may or may not be the first stop on the student's journey to solving the problems presented to them. They do not tell us nor do we ask. They rarely post the source of their uncertainty.
Couple that with "google translated" inquiries from non-Greco/roman languages, and it becomes a communication dance to get to the problem statement.
There are some assumptions made by all who answer the questions posed here. One of which is the students have already seen their problem worked out before and are struggling with replicating the effort with a similar problem. This is a failure in their associative learning process. These type failures demand the students to produce their work up to the present so the membership can "troubleshoot" and explain where the student went astray.
Sometimes it's like pulling teeth to get information from the OP, sometimes it's not.
Learning to differentiate between those wanting to learn and those wanting the answer is not easily seen by some who answer. Those who "answer" deserve an applause for participation while being cautioned about providing answers. It's a fine line.
A few years back I was asked how I discriminated against the two types of posters (those who want to learn and those who want only the answers). I told the person they would pick that up quick enough.
The Socratic method is the method used by the ebook and by association, this website.
We, the members, rarely get the Paul Harvey on the student's textbook or curriculum. Very few cite their source or provide a complete problem statement from the originator.
Everything considered, all the members do an outstanding job in the homework area.
I will agree with you, WBahn appears to be a very good teacher. Maybe he will "record" his lectures for his own vBlog.
This forum may or may not be the first stop on the student's journey to solving the problems presented to them. They do not tell us nor do we ask. They rarely post the source of their uncertainty.
Couple that with "google translated" inquiries from non-Greco/roman languages, and it becomes a communication dance to get to the problem statement.
There are some assumptions made by all who answer the questions posed here. One of which is the students have already seen their problem worked out before and are struggling with replicating the effort with a similar problem. This is a failure in their associative learning process. These type failures demand the students to produce their work up to the present so the membership can "troubleshoot" and explain where the student went astray.
Sometimes it's like pulling teeth to get information from the OP, sometimes it's not.
Learning to differentiate between those wanting to learn and those wanting the answer is not easily seen by some who answer. Those who "answer" deserve an applause for participation while being cautioned about providing answers. It's a fine line.
A few years back I was asked how I discriminated against the two types of posters (those who want to learn and those who want only the answers). I told the person they would pick that up quick enough.
The Socratic method is the method used by the ebook and by association, this website.
We, the members, rarely get the Paul Harvey on the student's textbook or curriculum. Very few cite their source or provide a complete problem statement from the originator.
Everything considered, all the members do an outstanding job in the homework area.
I will agree with you, WBahn appears to be a very good teacher. Maybe he will "record" his lectures for his own vBlog.