the question can be found here:
http://www.MailFreeOnline.com/uploader/DEA77C24.jpg
V_in vs V_BE: i'm guessing the 2 are independant quantities, so i should see a flat line
V_in vs I_b: I_b is very close to 0 until V_in gets to 0.7, where it shoots up exponentially
V_in vs I_c: since I_c = BI_b, i expect this graph to have the same shape as the one for V_in vs I_b, but I_c flatlines when it reaches the saturation current of 10mA.
V_in vs V_L: no idea
V_in vs V_out: V_out = 10 - R_c*I_c, so i expect this to look the same as the reltionship between V_in and I_c but reflected along the y axis, scaled up and given an intercept of 10.
^ the above were ALL on-the-spot guesses. i have no idea if they are right. could anyone verify what i've done/correct me? thanks in advance.
http://www.MailFreeOnline.com/uploader/DEA77C24.jpg
V_in vs V_BE: i'm guessing the 2 are independant quantities, so i should see a flat line
V_in vs I_b: I_b is very close to 0 until V_in gets to 0.7, where it shoots up exponentially
V_in vs I_c: since I_c = BI_b, i expect this graph to have the same shape as the one for V_in vs I_b, but I_c flatlines when it reaches the saturation current of 10mA.
V_in vs V_L: no idea
V_in vs V_out: V_out = 10 - R_c*I_c, so i expect this to look the same as the reltionship between V_in and I_c but reflected along the y axis, scaled up and given an intercept of 10.
^ the above were ALL on-the-spot guesses. i have no idea if they are right. could anyone verify what i've done/correct me? thanks in advance.