The arrival of Freevolt...

Discussion in 'Off-Topic' started by cmartinez, Nov 16, 2015.

  1. cmartinez

    Thread Starter AAC Fanatic!

    Jan 17, 2007
    3,574
    2,543
  2. joeyd999

    AAC Fanatic!

    Jun 6, 2011
    2,689
    2,750
    Hahahahahahahaha!
     
    nsaspook likes this.
  3. cmartinez

    Thread Starter AAC Fanatic!

    Jan 17, 2007
    3,574
    2,543
    yeah, I saw that too... it sounds ridiculous, unless they're talking about harvesting energy that recharges something that will drive a loudspeaker... the first instance is absurd, and the second one is dishonest.

    "Others have tried the same idea, but have struggled to produce energy with enough efficiency to make the technology commercially viable."

    Why am I not surprised?
     
  4. joeyd999

    AAC Fanatic!

    Jun 6, 2011
    2,689
    2,750
    You missed the point of my laughter. The statement:

    can be 100% factually true, yet entirely misleading. Great form!
     
    cmartinez likes this.
  5. cmartinez

    Thread Starter AAC Fanatic!

    Jan 17, 2007
    3,574
    2,543
    mmmhhhh... I think I get it now... you mean that there's nothing like showing a flashy demo to an impressionable audience to help sell a non-viable product?
     
  6. joeyd999

    AAC Fanatic!

    Jun 6, 2011
    2,689
    2,750
    There are two independent clauses in the sentence:

    1. Lord Drayson first showed how much radio frequency energy was in the room.
    2. [Lord Drayson] then used his Freevolt system to power a loudspeaker.

    No where does it say Freevolt used the radio frequency energy to power the loudspeaker.

    I guarantee he had lawyers working on this press release.
     
    cmartinez likes this.
  7. cmartinez

    Thread Starter AAC Fanatic!

    Jan 17, 2007
    3,574
    2,543
    Ah, the subtleties of language... thanks for illustrating
     
  8. RichardO

    Well-Known Member

    May 4, 2013
    1,235
    384
    If any of these "free" power devices ever work then radio station transmitters will have to be 50MW instead of 50KW. :eek:


    edit: Wait... make that at least 500MW. :)
     
    cmartinez likes this.
  9. cmartinez

    Thread Starter AAC Fanatic!

    Jan 17, 2007
    3,574
    2,543
    I wonder how the human body would be affected if it were exposed to that sort of radio power
     
  10. joeyd999

    AAC Fanatic!

    Jun 6, 2011
    2,689
    2,750
    You've not heard of RF burns?
     
  11. cmartinez

    Thread Starter AAC Fanatic!

    Jan 17, 2007
    3,574
    2,543
    Yeah, but I mean for ordinary people away from the antenna. I mean, I know that ordinary radio frequencies are non-ionizing and therefore are fairly safe. But let's say you are only about 100m away from an 500 MW FM emitter antenna ... would prolonged exposure affect the human body ?
     
  12. joeyd999

    AAC Fanatic!

    Jun 6, 2011
    2,689
    2,750
    You'd probably get well done over time, I guess.
     
  13. cmartinez

    Thread Starter AAC Fanatic!

    Jan 17, 2007
    3,574
    2,543
    or permanently tanned? .... no wait, that's from exposure to UV
    I don't event want to imagine one's brains reacting to that sort of power
     
  14. RichardO

    Well-Known Member

    May 4, 2013
    1,235
    384
    tesla_lightning.jpg

    :)
     
    Sinus23 and cmartinez like this.
  15. JoeJester

    AAC Fanatic!

    Apr 26, 2005
    3,373
    1,159
    @cmartinez

    The NATO guidelines recommends this Permissible Exposure Level (PEL)

    and then there's the barkhausen effect ... which can occur as low as 15 KV plate voltages in vacuum tube transmitters, as heard by the comments in this video. At one unit, they had reported 3 rems per hour in a location behind what you see. The PEL is like 3 mRems per year.

     
    • PEL.png
      PEL.png
      File size:
      25 KB
      Views:
      3
    Last edited: Nov 17, 2015
    cmartinez likes this.
  16. cmartinez

    Thread Starter AAC Fanatic!

    Jan 17, 2007
    3,574
    2,543
  17. GopherT

    AAC Fanatic!

    Nov 23, 2012
    6,059
    3,823
    That explains so much!

    I bought a wifi booster last month and, about two hours after I plugged it in, I've been smelling like baked ham.
     
    cmartinez likes this.
  18. Wendy

    Moderator

    Mar 24, 2008
    20,766
    2,536
    Amateur Radio anyone?
     
  19. cmartinez

    Thread Starter AAC Fanatic!

    Jan 17, 2007
    3,574
    2,543
    Could've been worse, could've ended up smelling like roasted gopher! :p
     
    ronv likes this.
  20. BR-549

    Well-Known Member

    Sep 22, 2013
    2,003
    393
    This will probably become very common. This type of circuitry will probably be part of the SoC on board tech.

    It might only support daily or hourly polling at the start, but it will get better.

    The voltage and pwr requirements have really fallen. And they can print these Socs for nothing.

    It’s amazing.

    Connect a small super capacitor or battery to one terminal, a random wire to another, add some time, and presto.......you can take a measurement and answer a poll. Real Magic.

    And no pwr bill. And it works in the dark!

    The bad thing of course is the loss of signal. I can remember when I was a kid, that whenever someone put up a new antenna in the neighborhood, how our signal went down.

    Did anyone else notice that?
     
Loading...