Simplicity as a Primary Condition of Nature and Evolution.

Discussion in 'Physics' started by socratus, Apr 28, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. socratus

    Thread Starter Member

    Mar 26, 2012
    267
    3
    Simplicity as a Primary Condition of Nature and Evolution.
    =.
    The evolution of Nature is going from simple to complex therefore
    I will take the simplest physical parameters in order to explain
    the primary conditions of evolution in Nature.
    1.
    The simplest reference frame is two dimensions (2D).
    There are two kinds of 2D: Euclidian (relative) and
    Pseudo-Euclidian (absolute according to SRT).
    What Euclidian 2D is - everybody knows.
    What Pseudo-Euclidian (negative - 2D) is - nobody knows.
    In my opinion (- 2D) is Zero Vacuum reference frame: T= - 273,15 . . . . .
    2.
    In this simplest negative reference frame (- 2D) only flat - circle
    particles can exist: c/d = 3,14 . . . . and they are the simplest original /
    primary quantum particles of Nature.
    3.
    These quantum particles in their simplicity contain their own
    inner – natural power / energy and impulses: h and h*=h/2pi.
    4.
    These particles obey "the law of conservation and transformation energy".
    This law is not book-keeper's calculations of "debit – credit".
    This law means:
    the simplest particles can keep and somehow transform their energy.
    =.
    Only on these simplest physical parameters (T= - 273,15 . . , c/d = 3,14 . . . ,
    h and h*=h/2pi ) and "the law of conservation and transformation energy"
    can be constructed the reliable castle for Quantum theory.
    ==..
    More than 300 years ago Newton wrote:
    " For the basic problem of philosophy seems to be to discover
    the forces of nature from the phenomena of motions
    and then to demonstrate the other phenomena from these forces."
    This Newton's offer is carried out fully in Quantum physics.
    ==...
    From the state of Simplicity was created and evolved
    the complex World of Matter, Consciousness, Knowledge.
    ==..
    Best wishes.
    Israel Sadovnik Socratus.
    ==..
     
  2. BR-549

    Well-Known Member

    Sep 22, 2013
    1,987
    388
    The orthogonal exchange between the electric and the magnetic require 3D.
     
  3. alfacliff

    Well-Known Member

    Dec 13, 2013
    2,449
    428
    wouldnt it have been simpler for evolution to have not made so many plants helpful to humanity as medicines? why add the complexity to willow trees to make asprin? what does the asprin do for the tree? there are many medicines derived from plants and trees, what use are they to the plants or trees?
     
  4. socratus

    Thread Starter Member

    Mar 26, 2012
    267
    3
    Somebody wrote : 1-D is simpler than 2-D.
    The answer.
    The 1-D figure is explained by "theory of string-particle".
    The result is written in the book "The trouble with Physics" by Lee Smolin.
    #
    Other wrote: a triangle is simpler than circle.
    The answer.
    The triangle has angles.
    To create angles needs some kind of forces.
    Without forces every flat geometrical figure would change into circle.
    ==..
     
  5. BR-549

    Well-Known Member

    Sep 22, 2013
    1,987
    388
    To make a triangle, you only need apply force at two different locations.

    To make a circle, you must apply force at all locations.

    If you relax a triangle or a circle, you get a line.

    1D.
     
  6. socratus

    Thread Starter Member

    Mar 26, 2012
    267
    3
    Interesting point.
    =.
    OK.
    If you take a particle in early sunny day to the beach of ocean
    then, maybe, it will be enjoyed to lie down on a sand and relax
    there as a "line".
    But if you take a particle in another reference frame, in the cold
    zero vacuum T=0K then the particle will relax in another way.
    As you wrote
    " To make a circle, you must apply force at all locations."
    To apply " force at all locations " means that the particle is
    in equilibrium state . . . . in relax state . . . in potential state.
    The equilibrium is primary state of particle.
    To change equilibrium is needed force.
    To create line is needed forces in two different directions.
    To create triangle is needed forces in three different directions. . . . etc
    Without forces every flat particle will change into equilibrium-
    - circle state: c/d=pi=3,14 . . . .
    The circle is most symmetrical geometrical form in T=0K.
    And again,
    The 1-D (line without thickness) is explained by "theory of string-particle".
    Theorists try to understand 1-D string in 11-D.
    The result is written in the book "The trouble with Physics" by Lee Smolin.
    In the other words:
    Where is Alice?
    Alice is in the 1-D String, 11-D Wonderland.
    ===…
     
  7. BR-549

    Well-Known Member

    Sep 22, 2013
    1,987
    388
    I don't believe force only has magnitude and direction. I think all force has a rotational vector also.

    I believe that the reactive force has a rotational component too.

    I think that 3D objects and 3D space is necessary for force and energy transfer.

    I believe that there are always 3 dimensions, and that spin creates a forth, independent of the original three. This dimension is called in and out. The effect is inertia.
     
  8. nsaspook

    AAC Fanatic!

    Aug 27, 2009
    2,908
    2,168
    We sort of agree on this point. Simple harmonic motion in 1d is a line, in 2d it's a circle and in 3d it's a helix with the projection of sine and cosine.
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: May 22, 2015
  9. BR-549

    Well-Known Member

    Sep 22, 2013
    1,987
    388
    I don't think that even one field line is just 2D. I think we'll find that a line grows out and moves in a lateral direction also. The line probably has curl or a twist to it.

    I believe that force and energy must be transferred thru resonance.

    A gamma ray range network analyzer would show us.

    The people on this site has been working with the universe all of their lives.
     
  10. nsaspook

    AAC Fanatic!

    Aug 27, 2009
    2,908
    2,168
    Maybe it's just a projection so its true nature is hidden if you live in a universe with fewer dimensions. We are limited by the space we can probe and measure. EM interactions were first explained by hyperdimension quaternions by Maxwell and simplified by Gibbs and Heaviside to vector mathematics later. There's no magic or voodoo in the original method but it's a natural way to describe rotations in 3D space by using 4D space that can be simpler and is more efficient for basic things like computer graphics and robotic movements when you want those motions to look 'natural'.
     
  11. DickCappels

    Moderator

    Aug 21, 2008
    2,653
    632
    Trolling is not tolerated on this site.
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.