Hello dear experts - good day,
I've been musing bout the question of using a single-board-computer (sbc). I might be able to put a single board computer to good use around the home, and so far I'm predicting I'm going to need at least half a dozen of them! Sounds like a few fun weekends ahead...
Does anyone know if there is the ability/opportunity to use a single board computer to run a small NAS operating system (and connect it up to a few USB hard drives)? Or is this not a good use-case, perhaps because a SATA connection is needed?
The other idea I had was to run samba Server on a single board computer as a back-end (and of course use another single board computer for a front-end) - does anyone know if that would be possible?
some musings: As far as the front-end, purely from a speed POV and not hardware/driver capabilities POV - the network speed will likely might be the bottleneck. But speed does not matter - i do not need a high-speed system here.
Depending on which software we use to render our streaming media, it may not even use the local storage to "cache" the streamed data. It might stream to an area in RAM and then be retrieved from there. We can also do things like NFS mounting, in which case it will render directly from the NAS drive(s). Would USB be too slow on the backend... probably? Again, depends on how we ve encoded, bitrates, what else will be using the drives at the same time, etc.
USB drives make for nice, cheap, decent backup (but of course not mission critical data - RAID does that) on a NAS setup, because they're big and cheap and nobody cares that they're relatively slow.
The question is: which system should i take: i think i want to use a powerful Single board computer - (SBC)
- which system is the most powerful today... with a little powerconsumption....
I've been musing bout the question of using a single-board-computer (sbc). I might be able to put a single board computer to good use around the home, and so far I'm predicting I'm going to need at least half a dozen of them! Sounds like a few fun weekends ahead...
Does anyone know if there is the ability/opportunity to use a single board computer to run a small NAS operating system (and connect it up to a few USB hard drives)? Or is this not a good use-case, perhaps because a SATA connection is needed?
The other idea I had was to run samba Server on a single board computer as a back-end (and of course use another single board computer for a front-end) - does anyone know if that would be possible?
some musings: As far as the front-end, purely from a speed POV and not hardware/driver capabilities POV - the network speed will likely might be the bottleneck. But speed does not matter - i do not need a high-speed system here.
Depending on which software we use to render our streaming media, it may not even use the local storage to "cache" the streamed data. It might stream to an area in RAM and then be retrieved from there. We can also do things like NFS mounting, in which case it will render directly from the NAS drive(s). Would USB be too slow on the backend... probably? Again, depends on how we ve encoded, bitrates, what else will be using the drives at the same time, etc.
USB drives make for nice, cheap, decent backup (but of course not mission critical data - RAID does that) on a NAS setup, because they're big and cheap and nobody cares that they're relatively slow.
The question is: which system should i take: i think i want to use a powerful Single board computer - (SBC)
- which system is the most powerful today... with a little powerconsumption....