Good! back to the drawing board then...Much, MUCH better!!!
Thanks... my big difference is that I understand the latter, but not the former.I would say go with what you're comfortable with, then; I don't see any big difference between the two approaches.
Negative voltages are just like positive voltages, except they're negative.I'm sure the answer is quite simple, but I've never worked with negative voltages before.
Gee... thanks for your positive input... couldn't resist either...Negative voltages are just like positive voltages, except they're negative.
Would you recommend I connected it to -5V? the -15V come from a switching power supply. What I'm trying to accomplish here is the most stable and accurate AC square wave I can get, that's why I worked on the current-boosted references first.Yep, that's what I had in mind, except I had R5 connected to -5V rather than -15V. Should work either way, though.
Thanks, I'm sure it will work both ways (max V at the gate is ±20V, min trigger is 2.5V). My question is more about which of the two sources will effect more noise at the output.Just check the specs for your MOSFET and see what the absolute maximum rated Vgs is. So long as it's rated for +/- 10V or more, you should be OK with R5 connected to -15V; otherwise, connect it to -5V.
Couldn't make it work that way... the negative output is giving me -10V insteadWhy do you need to operate U1/U2 as a follower? Seems to me you could just get rid of U4, C3, R4 & R5, ground the non-inverting input of U2, and connect R3 between the inverting input of U2 and +7V.
by Jerry Twomey
by Aaron Carman
by Duane Benson
by Aaron Carman