OLD POSTS

Discussion in 'Off-Topic' started by ronv, Feb 1, 2016.

What to do with necroposting

  1. Just let people post to them

    25.0%
  2. Lock threads older than 1 year

    10.0%
  3. Start a new thread for the poster and close the old thread

    15.0%
  4. If it's not a useless post or a hijack, let it ride.

    45.0%
  5. Lock it after 6-8months except for the OP and those that contributed already prior the locking

    5.0%
  1. ronv

    Thread Starter AAC Fanatic!

    Nov 12, 2008
    3,281
    1,232
    Spirited discussion about what to do with old posts when someone resurrects them.
    So being a trouble maker I thought I would start a poll. The problem is I'm not sure of all the pitfalls, so I'll list a few possibilities - please feel free to add. I'm not sure I can edit the poll so I'll put in a couple of others.

    1- Just let people post to them.
    Draw backs, Some posts can be very long and it's a pain to read thru them to find "I have the same problem".
    2- Lock them after 1 year with a note encouraging them to start a new thread.
    Drawbacks, Prevents the original poster from adding to their post. Creates multiple posts on the same topic.
    3- Start an new thread for the new poster and lock the old thread. Kind of like now.
    Drawbacks, The old thread is now locked.
    4- Other1 - Let the thread run if it is not a hijack or useless response. But mark it more clearly as an old post.
    Drawbacks - requires software change.
    5- Other2- locked after 6 or 8 months except for the OP and those that contributed already prior the locking. Drawbacks. Software changes.
     
    Last edited: Feb 2, 2016
    JohnInTX and cmartinez like this.
  2. wayneh

    Expert

    Sep 9, 2010
    12,087
    3,027
    I don't care whether a noob comes along two years late with advice on how to charge a battery. I just want a more obvious cue that that is what happened so I can ignore it and not accidentally get sucked into responding. Yes I know the information is already onscreen but I don't usually look.

    If it's not a useless post or a hijack, let it ride.
     
    Hypatia's Protege likes this.
  3. ronv

    Thread Starter AAC Fanatic!

    Nov 12, 2008
    3,281
    1,232
    I made your idea other1 in my post. Did I get it right?
     
  4. MaxHeadRoom

    Expert

    Jul 18, 2013
    10,500
    2,366
    I am a moderator of one site that has an average of 500 members on line at any given time.
    We allow necroposting IF the subject refers to the subject in the OP or thread in general.
    Otherwise we just move it to its own post.
    No thread is flagged or locked because of age.
    Max.
     
  5. ronv

    Thread Starter AAC Fanatic!

    Nov 12, 2008
    3,281
    1,232
    So the first choice?
    If so, can you click it?
     
  6. MaxHeadRoom

    Expert

    Jul 18, 2013
    10,500
    2,366
    Sounds a little like sedition.:p
    Max.
     
  7. ronv

    Thread Starter AAC Fanatic!

    Nov 12, 2008
    3,281
    1,232
    Maybe, not so sure. I'm not sure the mods really care that much one way or the other. But my bet is there isn't one solution that will satisfy everyone and they don't want to be jerked around.
    I could be wrong. If I am everyone will have the same vote.
     
    Lestraveled likes this.
  8. atferrari

    AAC Fanatic!

    Jan 6, 2004
    2,644
    759
    Maybe this could be the 2nd other: locked after say 6 or 8 months except for the OP and those that contributed already prior the locking.

    Leaving it open to close it if someone posts a follow up is a monument to futility.

    Otherwise, let it run with a warning.
     
  9. ronv

    Thread Starter AAC Fanatic!

    Nov 12, 2008
    3,281
    1,232
    Sounds good.
     
  10. JohnInTX

    Moderator

    Jun 26, 2012
    2,339
    1,022
    I added the option choices described above to the poll list - if I didn't get it right, let me know please.
    I appreciate the poll - so far the results are kind of broad but we'll see if a user consensus can be reached that also works for the staff (I'm not going back to lock 160K+ threads).
     
    ronv likes this.
  11. JohnInTX

    Moderator

    Jun 26, 2012
    2,339
    1,022
    We care. But yeah, sometimes you have to make a call that will satisfy some and anger others. We sometimes get hot-tempered reports from different users in the same thread each demanding different, contradictory actions be taken - sometimes against one another - and then hot PMs from the one who lost the argument. It's no-win sometimes. I'm encouraged by this dialog and hope we can reach a clear consensus that works for the boards.
     
  12. shortbus

    AAC Fanatic!

    Sep 30, 2009
    4,000
    1,512
    Or you could add another option, delete the whole archive.
     
  13. JohnInTX

    Moderator

    Jun 26, 2012
    2,339
    1,022
    The whole thread?
     
  14. ronv

    Thread Starter AAC Fanatic!

    Nov 12, 2008
    3,281
    1,232
    Don't forget to vote. :D
     
  15. wayneh

    Expert

    Sep 9, 2010
    12,087
    3,027
    I'm not sure what I was thinking (or drinking?) when I wrote "if it's not a useless post". I don't mind if a post to an old thread is completely useless, as long as I know it's an old thread. That's what I had explained in the preceding paragraph.

    So in the poll questions, my suggestion of letting it ride unless it's a hijack is essentially the same as "just let people post". Everyone agrees that outright hijacks are forbidden and that wasn't really the topic here.

    My point in #2 was simply that I wouldn't care about necroposting at all as long as I can easily tell that's what it is without having to remember to look at the dates of every thread I visit. So my vote is very similar to option #1 in the poll, with an asterisk.
     
    tracecom and ronv like this.
  16. ronv

    Thread Starter AAC Fanatic!

    Nov 12, 2008
    3,281
    1,232
    Maybe you can answer.
    Lets say it is a hijack. I think the mods move it to it's own post, but does that move the old hijacked post up into the active area where it is likely to get answered even though it's old? If so, do these get locked?
     
  17. wayneh

    Expert

    Sep 9, 2010
    12,087
    3,027
    Maybe I've misunderstood the question but I doubt a mod would take time to process a hijack that escaped their notice for more than a few days.

    Oh wait, that wasn't the question. (I need my coffee!). I don't know for sure but I don't think the old thread gets highlighted as new if a new post gets removed from it.
     
  18. shortbus

    AAC Fanatic!

    Sep 30, 2009
    4,000
    1,512
    Why not? If something as benign as necroposting gets peoples panties in a bunch, just eliminate the whole archive. Then every post is a new post, end of problem.

    With the number of people, long time members and new members, that respond to a reawakened post before it's recognized as such, most of the time it is due to a new member asking for more information or adding to the existing information. Why not keep ALL of the information in one place. Some times the necropost adds good information, some times not, but that's true of all threads. Spam would be treated just like all spam, deletion from a post.
     
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2016
  19. ronv

    Thread Starter AAC Fanatic!

    Nov 12, 2008
    3,281
    1,232
    Ever look to see how many people are looking at those archives?
    Right now there are 1000 while there are 50 members eager to answer their questions. :eek:
     
  20. shortbus

    AAC Fanatic!

    Sep 30, 2009
    4,000
    1,512
    You posted while I was typing, see above post.
     
Loading...