The one way to prove or disprove an aether is with an Interferometer.
A long time ago, in a universe far far away, two gentlemen, Michelson-Morley tried the experiment, came up negitive and every one went home...

Thank goodness for those of us who actually question what we are told and try the experiments ourself.
I believe that Aether is quantifiable and testable and now I got proof. I believe that aether is a rotating magneto-dielectric field with a quantum spin of two. I have fully quantified what I think it is and I learned this from Dave Thomson who figured out that aether existed via a Tesla Coil and he saw two distinct charges, soon he realized that the standard model failed to quantify Electrostatic Charge! So Dave put Electrostatic Charge Quantification into the standard model, and then going back to the SI units of measurement and starting with the Quantum Constants, the Aether Physics Model was born out of pure algebra and SI units.

The Aether Physics Model describes the quantum structure of space and matter as opposed the Standard Model, which describes only the quantum mechanics of matter. The two theories work side by side, however the Standard Model notates charge in units incorrectly.

The Aether Physics Model quantifies subatomic particles as being contained by Aether units. As matter becomes denser, Aether density also increases. Thus the Michelson-Morley experiment was setup incorrectly with the interferometer sweeping through a fairly consistent layer of Aether due to being tested in only a horizontal plane.

When the interferometer sweeps a plane intersecting the planet's center of mass, a clear measurement in Aether density occurs, as seen in the following video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7T0d7o8X2-E&feature=player_embedded

 

Here is a reply from a member of the Electric Universe forum.

Checking a little further, found this; from a blog post at Natural Philosophy Alliance (main site at Natural Philosophy Alliance)

12-13-2009
I have previously posted Martin Grusenick's repetition of the Michelson-Morley interference experiment with a new twist (vertical rotation instead of horizontal) in the video section.
http://worldnpa.ning.com/video/extended-michelsonmorley
Previously, I had posted on the experiment on my physics-and-economy blog at
http://blog.hasslberger.com/2009/09/extended_michelsonmorley_inter....
Both of those postings have attracted several comments which I, not being the experimenter, have some trouble answering and which Martin, not speaking English very well, is not reacting to either. But there is some more information, which I would like to post here.
There were several commenters who said his apparatus was not stable enough to exclude that material strain, induced by the influence of gravity during the vertical rotation of the experimental apparatus, produced the observed shifting of interference patterns.
Martin has repeated the experiment with a much stiffened set-up and here are the results he obtained, in his own words, as well as in several pictures.

"I have read your data with much interest. Many people say that my construction is mechanically too unstable, and that gravity influences my apparatus. So I built another one. A man named Norbert Feist provided me with better optical equipment to use. The new interferometer is only a steel plate with 189mm diameter and 8mm thick. The mirrors and the mirror holders are manufactured by Edmund, USA. Their beam splitter however is mechanically too unstable, so I used the one I made myself.
The interference pattern is projected on a small piece of paper. During a 180° rotation with the new Interferometer, I can see on average 1.5 interference fringe shifts during the night and 2.0 during daytime. With the older one, which you can see in the YouTube movie, there are 11.0 shifts at night and 11.5 if the experiment is performed during daytime. So, both Interferometers (the older and the newer one) show a difference of 0.5 interference fringe shifts between day and night.
I also would like to mention that a slight variation in the strength of the fringe pattern movement occurs during different days of the month. On Thursday 16.10.2009 at 24.00 o clock, I could see a full 3.0 interference fringe shifts per 180° rotation (with the new interferometer).
The zero point, where a standstill of the pattern movement happens, is for both interferometers at the same position. There are two zero points in a 360° rotation of both interferometers when the beam splitter is positioned horizontally to the earth's surface.
To all people who say that the only influence on the interferometer is gravity, I have a simple question. Why is there no zero point or stop of the fringe pattern movement when the beam splitter is in the vertical position? In the beam splitter's vertical position, the mirrors and the mirror holders are symmetrically pushed by gravity. But there is no zero point."

SOURCE: http://worldnpa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/grusenick-repetition-of
There are photos of the setup at the above link

Another interesting comment from the blog's comment section

12-20-2009
Martin Grusenick wrote:
“To all people who say that the only influence on the interferometer is gravity, I have a simple question. Why is there no zero point or stop of the fringe pattern movement when the beam splitter is in the vertical position? In the beam splitter's vertical position, the mirrors and the mirror holders are symmetrically pushed by gravity. But there is no zero point.”
Pierceonline responds:
I think Martin makes a good point. The zero point should occur when the beam splitter is in the vertical position where the gravitational flexion of the beam splitter is at a minimum. Therefore, I do not believe the movement of the interference pattern is influenced by gravity; however, it may be influenced by the magnetic field of the earth. Michael Faraday wrote the first literary evidence that light could be influenced by a magnetic field. Michael Faraday conducted a long series of experiments involving magnetism and light before writing “Experimental Researches in Electricity” in 1844.
In a book written by Robert P. Crease titled “The Great Equations” (ISBN 978-0-393-06204-5) is a passage (page 135) that reads as follows: “Among other things, Faraday discovered induction --- that a moving magnet creates current in a wire, and a changing current creates a current in another wire --- and the (Faraday Effect) --- when polarized light passes through glass in the presence of magnetism its plane of polarization is rotated, meaning that magnetism can affect light.”
Solar winds from the Sun compresses the flux density of Earth’s magnetic field facing the Sun and expands the flux density on the dark side of Earth. Grusenick’s device may be detecting the difference in magnetic flux densities between night and day. The magnetic flux density should be greatest at 1200 Hrs and weakest at 2400 Hrs.
If the beam splitter is affected by Earth’s magnetic field, replace the iron metal plate platform and the “beam splitter’s” frame mount and bolt/fasteners with aluminum or some other non-magnetic material. You may get back your 11.5 interference pattern shift.
Lot’s of luck to Martin Grusenick as he promotes his most interesting experiment. I would be interested to know if other Physicist’s share my sentiment that Earth’s magnetism may be playing a role here. No doubt, this experiment merits duplication in other laboratories.
SOURCE: http://worldnpa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/grusenick-repetition-of

This post from the blog raises the gravity question based on the original setup/video, prior to the redesigned setup. http://worldnpa.ning.com/video/extended-michelsonmorley

Well since the firmer device produced finer detail in the Interferometer results, I am placing this on the table as a positive result and that the Aether is quantifiable and testable. Aether is a rotating magnetic-dielectric field with a quantum spin of 2. The interferometer results have now taken the whole subject and put it back on the table in a serious form with results that can be replicated and need to be explained and incorporated into the new standard model.

In this model Charge rules the universe....not gravity. Take a ride onto the wild side and learn what Tesla was really talking about. Enter the world of dimensional quantum resonance, where charge is always distributed. Where Electrostatic charge becomes quantified and Electromagnetic charge holds the nucleus together. Where the plasma universe is explained via electric properties, not gravity and foolish talk about dark matter and dark energy, what a black hole that is!

 

Copy & paste spewey. 36 posts in 36 hours you're a copy and paste machine.
Found the same drivel here.
http://www.crank.net/aether.html

 

You posted nothing but speeuie yourself.
Thanks for the input.

I always quote.
I never plagerize.

 

But why are you posting at all? Do you have an electronics question?

 

I am posting because I am a member.
I have a degree in Electronics, Electronic Engineering Technologist, since 1982, Radio College of Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

I have experinece in Satellite Technology and Military and Commercial Sonar Technology.

I also have a Registered Medical Degree in Ontario.
I have taught college for five years.

I like astronomy, and long walks on the beach.


I found out that my college diploma was not worth crap.
I was never told about Tesla. Infact Tesla is not mentioned in the MIT lecture series on EM.
I found out that Heavisides reduction of the Maxwell Quaternion set of 20, took out the Scalar field.
I learned that the Universe is Electric and that it is supported by the IEEE.

I am not a spammer.

 

If you want to do something productive then help the thousands of hapless toadies (clueless 4th year EE students) what they can do for their final year project. Seriously the electronic forums are overrun by the help me plz crowd about this time of year.

 

And not just his one...