I watched a program on the history channel last night about ancient megoliths, such as mach picchu, stone henge, et. al., most recently constructed being coral castle in florida. The program seemed to only interview "experts" who proposed wild explanations such as aliens levitating stones with tractor beams from space ships & laser cutting the stones; merlin the wizard turning people into 30 ton stones; and ancient mystics levitating stones with anti gravity supernatural powers.
The program recounted words from the builder of coral castle Ed Leedskalnin, who reputedly built the megolith by himself containing 15-30ton stones with nothing but a telephone pole tripod & block/tackle (& some small black box which he referred to as a "pertetual motion holder") "The force we know as gravity and electromagnetism are the same thing".
I searched for a "well grounded" answer (I guess that term is relative now, considering the HISTORY channel now entertains theories that belong in sci-fi novels) to the technique of moving large objects without heavy machinery and came up with this: http://www.theforgottentechnology.com/newpage1
That method seems very logical and I can see how sone henge could be constucted that way, but what about machu picchu? How did they transport those massive boulders up to the top of a mountain?
What about the cutting of the stones at machu picchu?
They say the cutting of the granite stones at machu picchu could not have been accomplished with the primitive tools available at the time. It is difficult to cut granite even today; diamond cutters are needed. Even with the machinery available today, the complex joints between the stones could not be done; the stones fit so tightly and perfectly together that it would be impossible (so "they" say, but that's not the issue, the issue is how the ancients did it). One of the nut jobs on the program suggested that the stones were super heated to a putty consistency and molded together; I must admit, it really does look like that.
So, what method do you guys think is responsible for the constuction of stone structures of antiquity?
The program recounted words from the builder of coral castle Ed Leedskalnin, who reputedly built the megolith by himself containing 15-30ton stones with nothing but a telephone pole tripod & block/tackle (& some small black box which he referred to as a "pertetual motion holder") "The force we know as gravity and electromagnetism are the same thing".
I searched for a "well grounded" answer (I guess that term is relative now, considering the HISTORY channel now entertains theories that belong in sci-fi novels) to the technique of moving large objects without heavy machinery and came up with this: http://www.theforgottentechnology.com/newpage1
That method seems very logical and I can see how sone henge could be constucted that way, but what about machu picchu? How did they transport those massive boulders up to the top of a mountain?
What about the cutting of the stones at machu picchu?
They say the cutting of the granite stones at machu picchu could not have been accomplished with the primitive tools available at the time. It is difficult to cut granite even today; diamond cutters are needed. Even with the machinery available today, the complex joints between the stones could not be done; the stones fit so tightly and perfectly together that it would be impossible (so "they" say, but that's not the issue, the issue is how the ancients did it). One of the nut jobs on the program suggested that the stones were super heated to a putty consistency and molded together; I must admit, it really does look like that.
So, what method do you guys think is responsible for the constuction of stone structures of antiquity?