I'd lose the pot and increase R2 to at least 2k2 - maybe 4k7.Yeah, you can (and should) lose the pot as long as R2 is adequate to limit current through the transistor.
I'd lose the pot and increase R2 to at least 2k2 - maybe 4k7.Yeah, you can (and should) lose the pot as long as R2 is adequate to limit current through the transistor.
That's one of the things I look for when testing MOSFETS among harvested components - Using the voltage present at the prods of a continuity tester; I charge the gate capacitance, then with the same continuity tester I check that the D/S channel is conducting - if the gate charge leaks away during this test, the MOSFET is regarded as suspect.Yes! That's one of the great features of a MOSFET, that no current is required to hold it on.
A downside is the current required to switch the MOSFET at very high frequencies. (They have an inductance as well as capacitance.) I don't know where the crossover occurs, but at a high enough frequency the current needed to switch a MOSFET will exceed the amount needed to switch a BJT.
No, this is wrong. It will leak away slowly, never heard of anyone using Ian's method for checking mosfets. If your circuit is working as you now have it configured, I wouldn't mess with it. Just use it and enjoy it.The charge on the gate capacitor is enough to hold it open? Fully?
MOSFETs often have a body diode that will conduct from S to D, so you need to be careful of polarity when you look for leakage that way.Next; I use the tester to charge the gate capacitance in the reverse direction and verify no leakage through the D/S channel.
If the open circuit gate charge leaks away - the gate oxide layer has most likely suffered ESD damage.No, this is wrong. It will leak away slowly, never heard of anyone using Ian's method for checking mosfets. If your circuit is working as you now have it configured, I wouldn't mess with it. Just use it and enjoy it.