Does anybody know when we are planning on going to mars? They need to stop asking the government to fund there planned missions to the moon and get on with it, we already have the moon under our belt!
Perhaps the UN should be charged with organizing that effort. Its history of efficiency and success can't be ignored.an international coalition seems the most likely route to me.
i see what you're trying to say, obviously, and must respectfully disagree. competition merely created the conditions for which a moon-shot could be developed. cooperation made it work.The Apollo Moon shots worked because of competition, not cooperation.
with the proper conditions to satisfy national egos, i don't see how any nation could refuse the call to duty. calling it competition or cooperation is perhaps just a semantic exercise in the grand scheme of things. coke or pepsi, it's still just carbonated sugar-water.The more governments in the mix the less likely it will get done. All it takes is one government to back down at the wrong time, or try to blackmail others into doing things its way.
hmm, let's see. off the top of my head:OK, name any first that was a result of cooperation, the current space station is the biggest example of international cooperation, but was beat by both SkyLab and Mir. Fact is, cooperation only works if it is prior art, anything new tends to be horded.
yes i know about arpanet. i was talking about the www as we know it today. there were numerous 'firsts'.Uhh, no. The internet was born of the cold war,
^^ slightly different mandate than continuity of government in a nuclear holocaust.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wide_Web said:At CERN in Geneva, Switzerland, Berners-Lee and Belgian computer scientist Robert Cailliau proposed in 1990 to use "HyperText ... to link and access information of various kinds as a web of nodes in which the user can browse at will",[2] and publicly introduced the project in December.[3] "The World-Wide Web was developed to be a pool of human knowledge, and human culture, which would allow collaborators in remote sites to share their ideas and all aspects of a common project."[4]
well the atomic bomb example, which you didn't address, is not so far afield. my point was that the science as well as the 'push' was international and involved cooperation.Besides, I thought we were talking the space programs. You went a bit afield there for your example.
and prior to tubes, rooms full of women were used for such calculations.The computer was a concept invented by Babbage, but the first implementations were WWII and post WWII (cold war again). The first really practical computer (Eniac?) was used to make artillery tables for the army (for trajectories). It used vacuum tubes.
granted, military does what it does.You will find, if you study history, many major inventions start off military, then spread to civilian applications as the tech becomes common place. There are obvious exceptions, but the military provides a lot of R&D incentive. There was a saying when I was a kid, military hardware tends to be 20 years ahead of the civilian counterparts. That lead time may be less now, but it is still there, and classified.
seems that in terms of firsts, these civilian rockets were pretty well on their way before the military picked up on them.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_H._Goddard said:Not all of Goddard's early work was geared towards space travel. As the United States entered World War I in 1917, the country's universities began to lend their services to the war effort. Goddard believed his rocket research could be applied to many different military applications, including mobile artillery, field weapons and naval torpedoes. He made proposals to the Navy and Army. No record exists of any interest by the Navy to Goddard's inquiry. However, Army Ordnance was quite interested, and Goddard met several times with Army personnel.
...
During the First and Second World Wars, Goddard offered his services, patents and technology to the military and made some significant contributions. Several young Army officers and some higher ranking ones believed Goddard's research was important, but were unable to generate funds for his work.[40]
True but it wasn't until the invention of HTTP and HTML at CERN that the World Wide Web took off. Prior to that the internet was composed of command-line based applications such as "sendmail" and "FTP" and was not very user-friendly Most internet users were either academics or researchers, with virtually no private citizens having access.Uhh, no. The internet was born of the cold war, it expanded after several US universities established the standards and the early network. It's original intent was to spread the footprint of the network so a nuclear strike couldn't take out any central points. Universities being what they are, it grew from there.
As for a mission to Mars, I defiantly would not be holding my breath. There is not one space power on the horizon that even has the ability (either technical or financial) to send men back to the Moon, going to Mars is a whole lot more difficult and many times more expensive. The US, Russia and the EU are all pretty much down the gurgler financially. China or India might be able to afford it but both countries have much more pressing issues to spend money on rather than some dubious and very expensive publicity stunt.Besides, I thought we were talking the space programs. You went a bit afield there for your example.