M.S.

Discussion in 'Math' started by fpoint, Apr 29, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. fpoint

    Thread Starter New Member

    Mar 28, 2015
    11
    0
    I will present you a math composed of only two basis (natural and realistic basis)

    Current mathematics (CM.)

    Natural Base
    -natural straight line the main axiom, its beginning or end point and natural straight line a defined length and with two points
    NOTATION - natural straight line (lower case), points (capital letters or numbers (when specified point uploads metric (such as the number line)))
    m.png
    -natural gaps negation natural straight line , natural emptiness and emptiness is defined with two points
    NOTATION - natural gaps (small underlined letter)
    mm.png
    -basic rule merger - natural straight line and natural gaps are connected only points
    -basic set - all possibilities defined theorem
    (CM.)does not know the natural straight line , point is not defined, knows no natural gap, is not defined by basic set
     
  2. Papabravo

    Expert

    Feb 24, 2006
    10,142
    1,790
    So what's your point?
     
  3. studiot

    AAC Fanatic!

    Nov 9, 2007
    5,005
    513
    Note this nonsense is currently doing the rounds of technical forums (again, this is not the first time)
     
  4. WBahn

    Moderator

    Mar 31, 2012
    17,743
    4,795
    I vote TROLL!
     
    DerStrom8 likes this.
  5. Papabravo

    Expert

    Feb 24, 2006
    10,142
    1,790
    Sic 'em!
     
  6. fpoint

    Thread Starter New Member

    Mar 28, 2015
    11
    0
    Can you get a lot of mathematics without axioms, when you simplify the possible new discoveries

    Theorem - Natural straight line (natural gap) are connected in the direction of the points AB (0.1)
    PROOF - straight line (gaps) b (\underline{b}) -defined AC (0,2)
    m1.png
    - straight line (gaps) c (\underline{c}) -defined AD (0,3)
    m2.png
    ...
    infinite one way straight line (oneway infinite gaps) ∞ (\underline{\infty}) defined A∞ (0, ∞)
    m3.png
    (CM.) - straight line (not from the natural basis), there is gaps, a one-way infinite straight line the (semi-line (not from natural base)), one-way infinite gaps does not exist
     
  7. #12

    Expert

    Nov 30, 2010
    16,284
    6,797
    You have the power.
    Personally, I can't understand a bit of this, but my top level of math is algebra.
     
  8. djsfantasi

    AAC Fanatic!

    Apr 11, 2010
    2,804
    833
    SECONDED!!
     
  9. studiot

    AAC Fanatic!

    Nov 9, 2007
    5,005
    513
    I wish I could remember the name of the 'member' who posted this same stuff here a few years ago.

    Perhaps someone else can so we can find that thread.
     
  10. djsfantasi

    AAC Fanatic!

    Apr 11, 2010
    2,804
    833
  11. BR-549

    Well-Known Member

    Sep 22, 2013
    1,987
    388
    Can you put that in a word problem for me?
     
  12. WBahn

    Moderator

    Mar 31, 2012
    17,743
    4,795
  13. studiot

    AAC Fanatic!

    Nov 9, 2007
    5,005
    513
    Yes, I think that was the user, but I don't think that was the tread, he had several and one had lines and gaps drawn exactly as this one.

    Also the user was one of those that never actually responded to a comment, but just kept adding more and more (junk ?) to the pile with each successive post.
     
  14. djsfantasi

    AAC Fanatic!

    Apr 11, 2010
    2,804
    833
    Is the drug best taken ice cold and drunk with pizza?
     
  15. studiot

    AAC Fanatic!

    Nov 9, 2007
    5,005
    513
    Now you are talking.

    :)
     
  16. fpoint

    Thread Starter New Member

    Mar 28, 2015
    11
    0
    I answer only to meaningful questions, if from what I told you he presented did not understand then you can not help (because knowledge can not teleport into your brains, or learn or do not learn), you must have some mathematical knowledge ...

    Theorem - there is a relationship between the points 0 and all points one-way infinite straight line(one-way infinite gaps) including points 0

    PROOF - relationship points 0 points 0 and the number 0
    c1.png

    -relationship points 0 points 1 and the number 1( \underline{1})
    c2.png

    -relationship points 0 points 2 and the number 2 (\underline{2})
    c3.png
    ...

    basic set of natural numbers N^o=\{0 , 1 , 2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,...\}
    basic set of natural numbers gaps N_p^o=\{0 , \underline{1} ,\underline{2} ,\underline{3} ,\underline{4} ,\underline{5} ,...\}

    (CM.) - natural numbers are given as an axiom, there is no natural gaps numbers (there is this form, but do not call numbers (\{0,0\}\cup\{a,a\} a\in N)
     
  17. Alec_t

    AAC Fanatic!

    Sep 17, 2013
    5,797
    1,103
    Playing devil's advocate here, how would a fraction, such as 2/5, fit into this scheme of things?
    Are the gaps quantised or continuous?
    Why is the line only 'one way'? What about negative numbers?
    Can you give us an example of a real-world application of this theorem?
     
    Last edited: May 1, 2015
  18. bertus

    Administrator

    Apr 5, 2008
    15,648
    2,346
    Hello,

    I have nothing with math, but I see it this way.

    The upper part are the real numbers, they can have ANY value:

    [​IMG]

    The lower line are integer numbers, they can only be whole values.

    Bertus
     
  19. studiot

    AAC Fanatic!

    Nov 9, 2007
    5,005
    513
    The person you are copying is asking for help on other pure mathematical forums to prove his stuff (with no success).

    If he doesn't understand it, how can you and how can we, thirdhand?
     
  20. DerStrom8

    Well-Known Member

    Feb 20, 2011
    2,428
    1,328
    Definitely a troll.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.