While most of you have labored in the dark ages of Windows, Linux has been quietly taking over.
I look forward to the day when Redmond is just a city in Washington.
I look forward to the day when Redmond is just a city in Washington.
Not here it hasn't. I found it a right pain to use.
Yeah... but in the meantime, it can be a very useful tool to help people migrate.Using a Windows emulator in Linux to run those programs rather defeats the purpose.
But what good is that, if the Windows programs aren't ported over to Linux?Yeah... but in the meantime, it can be a very useful tool to help people migrate.
Like Windows 10?Yes, you can grow a sizable market share when your product is reverse-engineered from an existing product and you give your product away for free.
I get your point... I wonder, how much time would it take an average geek like most of us here to learn Linux and be as proficient at it as with Windows/DOS?But what good is that, if the Windows programs aren't ported over to Linux?
And I don't see that happening in the foreseeable future.
Oh! I like it just fine! Now I'm saying ppl can just use a VM for their unported sftwe in the meantime while vendors get with the future!Like it or not, Linux has taken over
Maxheadroom that doesn't make sense? If you like the hardware but don't like Unix why not just install another OS? Is there software/hardware compatibility issues with doing that?I actually played around with one of the Unix P.C.'s beautiful machine but no software for it!
That was well over two decades ago, I just reviewed the P.C. for someone that was bringing them in, at that time the graphics it had and the potential seemed to be way ahead of what the MSDOS P.C.'s had at that time.Maxheadroom that doesn't make sense? If you like the hardware but don't like Unix why not just install another OS? Is there software/hardware compatibility issues with doing that?
Not here it hasn't. I found it a right pain to use.
The problem is that most of the programs I use only run on Windows.
Using a Windows emulator in Linux to run those programs rather defeats the purpose.
I installed Linux on ALL of my machines. Then I realised that A) I had to give up 90% of my software because my computers do not have the power to run a virtual machine (also defeats the point of having linux) and B) around 30% of my software would not work under wine.
Plus, proper driver support (such as AMD overdrive) is not as good or does not exist.
Now I only run windows 7 (and XP)
But what good is that, if the Windows programs aren't ported over to Linux?
And I don't see that happening in the foreseeable future.
I must be doing something wrong. For 14 years I've been running an engineering/manufacturing business on Linux. It's installed on all my desktops and laptops. I use it for product development from the ground up, nuts to bolts. I email, surf, and play on Linux.I get your point... I wonder, how much time would it take an average geek like most of us here to learn Linux and be as proficient at it as with Windows/DOS?
So when your control center acts up your computer has a 'yeast infection'?The current versions of linux can also do almost anything with the mouse.
I am using OpenSuse tumbleweed and in there you have a control center called yeast.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
K | Linux Source Code Folder Structure | Programming & Languages | 9 | |
Embedded programming on Linux | Microcontrollers | 4 | ||
D | TCL / Linux question | Software & IDEs | 3 | |
Linux at Home | Off-Topic | 40 | ||
Any Linux experts out there? | Software & IDEs | 8 |