Is it possible to bring back the symbols dialog box?

Thread Starter

WBahn

Joined Mar 31, 2012
30,078
With the VB version, there was a dialog box that was available off to the side (with Go Advanced?) that had a selection of special symbols that you could insert. Now you have to remember the Alt-codes, which is a pain. Would it be fairly easy to resurrect that (and perhaps extend it to include a few more commonly used symbols that the prior one lacked)?
 

jrap

Joined Jun 25, 2006
1,125
Unfortunately there is no out-of-the-box solution for this. Give me a week or so and I'll see what I can do!

Rob
 

studiot

Joined Nov 9, 2007
4,998
This add-on was shared to us by the staff at
Well done for bringing it back, though it is currently unavailable to me as is the whole bar.

Actually I persuaded the staff at PhysicsForums copied the symbol box from AAC a couple of years ago.

Superscript and subscript are even more useful, and may be found here at http://www.scienceforums.net/
 

studiot

Joined Nov 9, 2007
4,998
It's the most up to date version of IE available on my bog standard Dell with Windows XP.

It is to the eternal discredit of the sofware industry that I am unwilling to update further because I have invested many hundreds of £ in software that requires activation and cannot be transferred to a later computer, should I upgrade.

In particular I have MathType and MathCad authorised on this computer.
 

bertus

Joined Apr 5, 2008
22,278
Hello studiot,

Do you have some space left on your harddisk?
A full linux distribution will take about 20 Gb + the space ypu want to use for your Home directory, where the user data is stored.
You might want to have a look at Mathlinux, wich contains a lot of free math programs.
http://mathlinux.com/
It has Scilab and Octave as standard programs onboard:
http://www.scilab.org/
http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/

Here is an other overview of math related programs for linux:
http://linuxappfinder.com/utilities/math

Bertus

PS I am using qupzilla as browser at the moment and the symbols add-in works fine with it on my linux machine.
http://www.qupzilla.com/
 

studiot

Joined Nov 9, 2007
4,998
FYI I can see the symbol drop down in IE11.
Thank you, so can I, on a windows7 computer

Edit and I would like to say the increase in the number of available symbols is greatly welcomed.

But I can't then access any of the programs I use to prepare posts, since they are all on the XP machine.
 
Last edited:

Thread Starter

WBahn

Joined Mar 31, 2012
30,078
The only problem I have is that when I add a symbol it always places it at the very beginning of the dialog box and not where the cursor is. Very annoying, but workable. I'm using IE 11 under Win7.

It would be nice to add the logical negation symbol, ¬ (Alt-170), to the list as well as the basic n and square superscripts ⁿ (Alt-252) and ² (Alt-253). Having a few subscripts would be nice, too.

Would it be possible to find a different glyph for pi and tau, these just don't look like what most people are used to seeing (in my experience). The Courier ones, π (Alt-227) and τ (Alt-231) seem much nicer. But while you see the nice forms in the dialog box when you prepare your reply, these are rendered as the boxy forms when it displays the resulting post. Below they are in a code box which seems to render them as intended.

Code:
π τ
 

Papabravo

Joined Feb 24, 2006
21,228
I use Chrome in Win 7 and I don't have the same placement problem, but I do have the objectionable change from the entry box to the actual rendering on the forum page.
 

#12

Joined Nov 30, 2010
18,224
My Dell XP died almost 2 years ago. :(
I'm using Firefox on a Vista machine. No problems at all!
Ω≈∏Ψ
Ta-daa!
 

LDC3

Joined Apr 27, 2013
924
Hi all,

We have the symbols back. Within the editor, the symbols can be accessed by clicking the "S" button on the far right of the menubar. If you notice any symbols are missing, please let me know and I can add them.

This add-on was shared to us by the staff at http://www.physicsforums.com. I want to thank them a lot for helping us out!

Cheers,

Rob
It's strange that there is ⅓ and ⅜, but not 2/3, 1/8, 5/8, or 7/8.
 
Top