honestly, take it as you want. when i have people telling me what i don't need to do, and how i shouldn't be doing this but that -- which has nothing to do with the two clearly defined questions i posted, i'll resort to the non-candy coated approach. like i said, two pages of people telling me that i need to find a n easier version of linux, that i don't need to be messing with the boot manager, etc. etc. and completely avoiding the questions -- that i've reposted over and over -- it takes a little more to get the point across. maybe when you ask a question and are given nothing but opinions for answers instead of useful information pertaining to the question, you'll understand.
A recap as to why the responses were hostile, since it seems there is selective reading:
"How do I do 1. ___ and 2. ___"
"You don't need to be messing with those"
"Use a different version of linux that will work"
"It's outdated and you should be installing XP first"
"That's not my question... refer to 1 and 2"
"*repeat responses*"
"Answer the questions, not give your opinions"
"get off your soapbox"
A recap as to why the responses were hostile, since it seems there is selective reading:
"How do I do 1. ___ and 2. ___"
"You don't need to be messing with those"
"Use a different version of linux that will work"
"It's outdated and you should be installing XP first"
"That's not my question... refer to 1 and 2"
"*repeat responses*"
"Answer the questions, not give your opinions"
"get off your soapbox"