Heck, it makes no difference to me anyway. I'll never have anything like 10^9 or 10^12 dollars, or even pennies, or farthings. Numbers like that are not a part of real experience for most of us.The forum poll is currently at 14 votes and 21% voted for the old 10^12 billion. (I voted for 10^9 billion).
He's worth 4 trillion?Interesting to note that Larry Ellison has something like 4x10^12 dollars, so he's a billionaire either way.
Exactly. See? Means nothing to me...I think you are off by a factor of 100.
No, not in Canada, but I was born in Ireland.Did you used to have farthings in Canada too?
We had them back when there were still 240 pence in the pound.
I don't think there are all that many scientific venues in which "billion" would be used over gigasomethings. So, fortunately, it probably isn't too much of a point of confusion in technical circles (except when talking about funding!).The talk ended up revolving around money, but it's natural that sums that big don't mean anything to us mere mortals when expressed in currency.
I still can't decide if I could live for the rest of my life with 10 million euros or if it's too little. I just can't wrap around the number in my mind. I 'd need pen and paper for that.
I had scientific purposes in mind when I brought up the subject.
Like I said, computer memory slings Giga around with ease, and we are firmly in Tera. It keeps growing.Hm... I guess you are right. We use Giga for Herz and beyond that I can't think of another unit right now that need that prefix.
Must be the completionist in my head acting up. However, I do remember having a lot of problems in high school that had such big quantities.
A billion used to be a million million (10^12).The talk ended up revolving around money.
by Jake Hertz
by Jake Hertz
by Jake Hertz
by Duane Benson