For the genesis of "Press 1...", press 2 -Early telephone technology

Thread Starter

AnalogKid

Joined Aug 1, 2013
11,038
For the genesis of "Press 1...", press 2

1611.18

In 1891, Almon Strowger (never heard of him) patented the rotary dial for the telephone (oh, that guy). He also invented the automatic telephone exchange, eliminating thousands of central office jobs and spawning acres of stepper-relays. COSI used to have a working one in a how-the-telephone-works exhibit. Over the decades Western Electric got very good at making them surprisingly reliable given how violent the mechanism is, but they still sucked. Bell Labs had a long-running research program searching for a replacement technology, building a complete tone-based system in 1941 that it later judged too difficult to mass produce reliably. (When you pushed a button it plucked a tuned string that played into the microphone – what could possibly go wrong...?) ATT Long Lines started using tones in the 50s to control long-distance routing, but at home the dial was the thing.

Cut to today, 1963, the day ATT made available for sale the Touch-Tone phone, with a rectangular keypad where the dial used to was. They premiered it at the 1962 World Expo in NY almost a year earlier to rave reviews. Huge demand, instant success, gigantic money-maker for Ma, and revolutionized man/machine interaction worldwide even though the buttons were upside-down. The players:

Henry Dryfus, an industrial designer working as a consultant to Bell Telephone, is credited with inventing the interface notion of the pushbutton.

John E. Karlin, an industrial psychologist at Bell Labs in Murray Hill, was responsible for the research used to develop the rectangular keypad, the shape of its keys and, yes, the position the numbers. So if you’ve ever wondered who was the genius that decided to make the phone keypad upside down compared to a calculator keypad, that would be John.

But the gold stars go to (wait for it) . . . . the ***analog circuit guys*** who worked out the analog circuit to make the tones. Decades of R&D had convinced everyone that there was no way to put tones into a phone without some kind of electronics. Vacuum tubes never were considered seriously because of their reliability, cost, reliability, size, reliability, power, and reliability. Even though Bell Labs had invented the transistor as a reliability upgrade to the tube, after 16 years it still was thought to be too delicate to put into an environment as dangerous as a domestic kitchen. It solved the power and size problems, but robust versions were expensive and a traditional circuit would take 4 per phone. Robust was important, and no one knew more than ATT about the true cost of reliability; when IBM had 40,000 employees, ATT had 40,000 *vehicles*.

At a time when the vast majority of transistor circuit design was actually a transistorization of a classical vacuum tube circuit, Frank Boesch and Harry Heffes had a better idea. Their circuit produced two tones per button, each switchable over a one-octave range, using exactly *one* (*1*) transistor. Frank and Harry created a new oscillator circuit with an elegance that is unmatched to this day. Besides only one active device (that lone transistor buried in a group of protection devices), it had two precision-wound coils (something WE figured out last century) and no calibration or tuning adjustments - 8 frequencies, each within a 1% tolerance, that never drifted and never failed. Original keypads still work today.

ak
 

djsfantasi

Joined Apr 11, 2010
9,163
I remember having dinner at my girlfriends house and listening to her father (an old Bell engineer) go on how touch tones could never replace the rotary dial. Just wasn't reliable, he said.
 

#12

Joined Nov 30, 2010
18,224
The first time I saw that the two tones were generated by one oscillator I was both baffled and amazed. I still am.
The first time I saw it, I was too ignorant to know what I was looking at, let alone appreciate its elegance.:D
 

OBW0549

Joined Mar 2, 2015
3,566
In 1891, Almon Strowger (never heard of him) patented the rotary dial for the telephone (oh, that guy). He also invented the automatic telephone exchange, eliminating thousands of central office jobs and spawning acres of stepper-relays. COSI used to have a working one in a how-the-telephone-works exhibit. Over the decades Western Electric got very good at making them surprisingly reliable given how violent the mechanism is, but they still sucked.
"Sucked" is an understatement. Back in the early 1970's I spent my Army enlistment teaching telephone central office equipment maintenance and repair at the Army Signal School in Fort Monmouth, New Jersey. Acres and acres of those thrice-accursed Strowger up-and-around switches with their rattley, clangy mechanisms and dozens of finicky relays. Ugh!!!
 

nsaspook

Joined Aug 27, 2009
13,265
"Sucked" is an understatement. Back in the early 1970's I spent my Army enlistment teaching telephone central office equipment maintenance and repair at the Army Signal School in Fort Monmouth, New Jersey. Acres and acres of those thrice-accursed Strowger up-and-around switches with their rattley, clangy mechanisms and dozens of finicky relays. Ugh!!!
I rebuilt many a Strowger switch for shipboard phone systems. I might even have one or two of the special tools somewhere in a canvas tool bag.
 
Last edited:

atferrari

Joined Jan 6, 2004
4,768
So if you’ve ever wondered who was the genius that decided to make the phone keypad upside down compared to a calculator keypad, that would be John.
No matter which layout you look at, both serve well to help in remembering the equivalent of one sea mile in meters: 1852.

I really liked your post, AK.
 

atferrari

Joined Jan 6, 2004
4,768
"Sucked" is an understatement. Back in the early 1970's I spent my Army enlistment teaching telephone central office equipment maintenance and repair at the Army Signal School in Fort Monmouth, New Jersey. Acres and acres of those thrice-accursed Strowger up-and-around switches with their rattley, clangy mechanisms and dozens of finicky relays. Ugh!!!
Had the chance to visit one of those central offices with thousands and thousands of them tightly packed in a huge room. The noise was overwhelming (close to frightening to me). People in charge used to carry the most sophisticated tool for maintenance that I have ever seen:

Nail file.jpg
 

nsaspook

Joined Aug 27, 2009
13,265
Had the chance to visit one of those central offices with thousands and thousands of them tightly packed in a huge room. The noise was overwhelming (close to frightening to me). People in charge used to carry the most sophisticated tool for maintenance that I have ever seen:

View attachment 115587
If I caught you using something like that on a switch-set I would kill you. :D

You used a proper burnishing tool set ALWAYS.
100_0220.jpg
http://www.pkneuses.com/www.pkneuses.com/cont.htm
http://www.pkneuses.com/www.pkneuses.com/rela.htm
 

atferrari

Joined Jan 6, 2004
4,768
If I caught you using something like that on a switch-set I would kill you. :D

You used a proper burnishing tool set ALWAYS.
View attachment 115589q
http://www.pkneuses.com/www.pkneuses.com/cont.htm
http://www.pkneuses.com/www.pkneuses.com/rela.htm
Not surprised of your comment because I know I heard somewhere it was considered close to brutal using them.

Later when I disassembled and old Ericsson console (used by a radio operator to switch xmtr frequencies by "dialing" them with a standard rotary disc) I became conscious of how delicate they were.

And then, some years later I was allowed to operate a Collins 618T xcvr with its marvelous automatic tuning antenna! Fascinating! Working in the ham bands with it, I felt like cheating.
 
Top