# Equalizer filter formulae

Discussion in 'The Projects Forum' started by MarkusBass, Jan 2, 2011.

1. ### MarkusBass Thread Starter New Member

Jul 31, 2010
8
0
I'm looking for formulae for the equalizer filter (see attachment). It is almost a T-filter but not exactly. Measured frequency of this filter is 600Hz (the pot is 100k).

Mark

2. ### Jony130 AAC Fanatic!

Feb 17, 2009
3,990
1,115
Here you have

R2=R7

pot is 100k = R1

R12=R13

$\omega_o = \sqr{ \frac{2*R2 + R1}{ R1*R2*C3*C4*(R2+R12)}}$

So

Fo = ωo / 2*∏

3. ### Jony130 AAC Fanatic!

Feb 17, 2009
3,990
1,115
And if you chose
C3 = 10*C4 ; R12 = 10*R1

Then

$\omega _o = \frac{1}{10*R1*C4} * sqrt{2 + \frac{R1}{R2}}$

$Q = sqrt{ \frac{2*R2+R1}{9.6*R2}}$

4. ### MarkusBass Thread Starter New Member

Jul 31, 2010
8
0
Great - this exactly what I needed . Can you point me to any reference about the design? I need also Q-factor and gain/cut formulae.
I don't need to mention that the formula matches exactly measured values. Thank you very much.
EDIT: you were quicker (providing the Q-factor formula). Shouldn't there be R12 = 10* R2?

Mark

5. ### Jony130 AAC Fanatic!

Feb 17, 2009
3,990
1,115
The only reference I know is

But a few months ago I with help of Mathematica software I analyzed this circuit:

R1 = 10K
R2 = 3.3K
R3 = 1.8K
R4 = 100K
R5 = 100K
R6 = 470K
R7 = 10K
C1 = 47nF
C2 = 4.7nF
C3 = 22nF
C4 = 4.7nF

And for the bass boost

F1 0.16/(R4 * C1)

F2
0.16/( R4||R1*C1)

Ku_max = (R1+R4)/R1

For mid boost (this circuit is the same as yours)

The circuit matrix

And the result

Last edited: Jan 2, 2011
6. ### Jony130 AAC Fanatic!

Feb 17, 2009
3,990
1,115
And treble booster

Ku_max = Ra||R6/R3

I hope this help.
Because I never find all this equation in any textbook.

Last edited: Jan 2, 2011
MarkusBass likes this.
7. ### MarkusBass Thread Starter New Member

Jul 31, 2010
8
0
I think that there is a small mistake in the substitution. It should be R12 = 100*R2,which leads to a different formula. Can you look at it?
My formula looks like this:
$\omega _o = \frac{1}{sqrt{1010}*R2*C4} * sqrt{1 + 2*\frac{R2}{R1}}$
and it seems to yield the same results as the previous one.
Does it change the Q-factor formula?

Mark

8. ### MarkusBass Thread Starter New Member

Jul 31, 2010
8
0
Thanks for all explanations. Accidentally I also analyze this curcuit (but with SPICE simulator and not Mathematica). Although it is similar to my curcuit, I did not like it. It's because the TREBLE pot has a great influence on the MID frequencies filter. And, as a result, it does not sound good .

Mark

Feb 17, 2009
3,990
1,115
File size:
22.1 KB
Views:
192
10. ### MarkusBass Thread Starter New Member

Jul 31, 2010
8
0
Hmm, in my circuit POT (R1) = 100k, R12 = 220k and R2 = 2.2k. I'm confused where did you take 1M from. So R12 meets the condition: R12 = 100 * R2, but definitely R12 is not equal to 10 * R1 . And the resulting frequency is 594Hz (both measured and calculated from the first formula). Am I missing something?
I wish, I had you knowledge to create those equations.
No, I haven't tried it (I may check it). The article from TI explains why this circuit is not very good. R7 = 100R creates a high frequency roll-off (page 2) and 10k pot does not have expected logarithmic effect (page 5). Although they say that 10k low value pot solves this problem, but it doesn't (I checked it).
Somehow my circuit handles these 2 problems correctly . That's why I'm working on it.
PS: I wanted to send you a PM but it seems that new members are not allowed to send private messages. In that case: "Bardzo dziękuję za pomoc".

Mark

11. ### Jony130 AAC Fanatic!

Feb 17, 2009
3,990
1,115
For optimize the quality factor Q it is reasonable to use:
R12 = 10 * POT and C3 = 10 * C4
And this equation holds only with above assumptions.

$F_o = \frac{ sqrt{2 + \frac{R1}{R2}}} {20*\pi*R1*C4}$

$Q = sqrt{ \frac{2*R2+R1}{9.6*R2}}$

"Your" circuit don't fully meet all above requirements.

So you force to use this equations

Well, all circuit have some drawbacks, your circuit for example has low Q factor. So if you want to build more then six bands equalizer, you are force to use Active inductor circuits.

And those circuit are much easier to design. And in professional equipment engineers also use gyrators .

Nie ma za co.
PS. To ci heca, dwóch Poloków rozmawia na forum po "ichnemu".

File size:
7.7 KB
Views:
171
File size:
45.9 KB
Views:
32
12. ### MarkusBass Thread Starter New Member

Jul 31, 2010
8
0
OK, I get it. But it means that several other components need to be changed too; R12 = 1M, R2 = 10k (otherwise gain is more than 20dB), capacitors C4= 900p, C3 = 9n (to keep the frequency at 600 Hz). As a result the Q-factor is even slightly lower than before.
Being frankly, I don't want to build a 31-band equalizer. I want to have just 3 bands (later maybe I will try 5 bands). And I want to have each filter to be independent from the other filters (as much as possible). I want to have gain/cut at 13 dB or less. It seems that this is quite a complex task since change of one component value influences several parameters.
Yes, I have to use the complex version of the formula. I still have some problems with Q-factor. I get values about 10% different from measured in SPICE but maybe I'm not measuring the bandwidth correctly.
Yes, I know but with 3-bands EQ this shouldn't be a problem. I hope to be able to use this circuit with 5-bands too.
Jony can you send me PM - maybe this topic is interesting to others.

Mark

13. ### Jony130 AAC Fanatic!

Feb 17, 2009
3,990
1,115
It is very strange but even I can not send PM to you.
So, maybe you check you Control Panel or ask administrator for help.

14. ### MarkusBass Thread Starter New Member

Jul 31, 2010
8
0
Can you try now? I changed permissions in my profile. If not, try Marek 2006 (bez spacji) on elektroda.

Mark

15. ### Jony130 AAC Fanatic!

Feb 17, 2009
3,990
1,115
Well, unfortunately, PM is still not available.
It appears that you unlocked email only, not PM.
But i send PM on elektroda