Forgive me if this has been addressed.
Is there an established procedure for introducing errors and requesting corrections into the books?
I understand and agree that the AAC authors have in the past both worked hard to avoid mistakes, and tended to have them corrected quickly.
* But what happens in the case of some disagreement over the content?
* What time-frame is reasonable for a correction request to be addressed?
I understand, volunteers, limited time, etc. But OTOH, if I am to present this material as an alternative to the traditional printed textbook from a textbook publisher, I have to be able to win the argument that the E-Book is equal to or greater than the other.
Therefore, may I ask, if there is not a well-defined procedure in place addressing the points mentioned above, or a compelling reason to avoid it. Why?
Sorry, I know this is going to take all of the fun out of it.
Is there an established procedure for introducing errors and requesting corrections into the books?
I understand and agree that the AAC authors have in the past both worked hard to avoid mistakes, and tended to have them corrected quickly.
* But what happens in the case of some disagreement over the content?
* What time-frame is reasonable for a correction request to be addressed?
I understand, volunteers, limited time, etc. But OTOH, if I am to present this material as an alternative to the traditional printed textbook from a textbook publisher, I have to be able to win the argument that the E-Book is equal to or greater than the other.
Therefore, may I ask, if there is not a well-defined procedure in place addressing the points mentioned above, or a compelling reason to avoid it. Why?
Sorry, I know this is going to take all of the fun out of it.