Driving TRIACS

Thread Starter

Dave Hooker

Joined Feb 18, 2015
11
Anyone had experience of driving a T2035H-6T triac using a MOC3043 opto-isolated trigger? I'm experiencing a situation where, at high temperatures, the triac will not switch off when the opto trigger is removed. This is self sustaining as the "on" triac maintains the level of heat. Spraying the "off" opto (MOC3043) with freezer causes the triac to switch off.
 

Denesius

Joined Feb 5, 2014
124
Spraying the "off" opto (MOC3043) with freezer causes the triac to switch off.
The LED junction of the opto is somewhat temperature sensitive, certain series more so than others. I'm not familiar with MOC3043 in particular, but the LED voltage on level will decrease with rising temp. Is the opto completely powered off, or is there residual current below the published trigger point? As #12 noted, a schematic would make things easier to sort out.
 

Thread Starter

Dave Hooker

Joined Feb 18, 2015
11
Schematic attached. There are 2 drivers in this application and the one with the triac closest to its opto (on the PCB) is exhibiting the problem. We think it's thermal conduction through the tracks. We have tried a bigger heat sink on the triac which appears to solve the problem BUT is a botch (on the PCB and enclosure). I would like to know the actual failure mechanism to see if there is a more correct or elegant solution. We could take the triac off the PCB and dangle it in the enclosure but not a nice solution. Any thoughts gratefully appreciated.
 

Attachments

Dodgydave

Joined Jun 22, 2012
11,303
What happens if you remove or increase the resistors R12,R14 to 1K when they latch,
also how are you driving the opto leds with a transistor or chip pin?
 

Thread Starter

Dave Hooker

Joined Feb 18, 2015
11
The LED junction of the opto is somewhat temperature sensitive, certain series more so than others. I'm not familiar with MOC3043 in particular, but the LED voltage on level will decrease with rising temp. Is the opto completely powered off, or is there residual current below the published trigger point? As #12 noted, a schematic would make things easier to sort out.
The opto is driven from a PIC port output and measures 4.5V when "off" with the Enable signal at 5V. I'm wondering now if that port o/p needs a pull up to 5V.
 

Thread Starter

Dave Hooker

Joined Feb 18, 2015
11
What happens if you remove or increase the resistors R12,R14 to 1K when they latch,
also how are you driving the opto leds with a transistor or chip pin?
I assume the circuit has been designed (not by me) from the data sheets so assume all triac resistors are as they should be. Driven from PIC port o/p.
 

#12

Joined Nov 30, 2010
18,224
The opto is driven from a PIC port output and measures 4.5V when "off" with the Enable signal at 5V. I'm wondering now if that port o/p needs a pull up to 5V.
This puzzles me. Are you saying the voltage delivered to the LED in the opto-coupler is 4.5V when off and 5V when on?

Your partial schematic does not show how the current flows in that circuit.

ps, 40 C is barely above the temperature of a person. This is not a problem for silicon, but heat sneaking in through the circuit board connectors seems to have been demonstrated in post #4.
 

ronv

Joined Nov 12, 2008
3,770
You are kind of pushing the triac.
The leakage of the opto goes up with temperature as well.
Might be worth a try to make R14 two or 3 times larger.
 

#12

Joined Nov 30, 2010
18,224
May I remind you that R12 and R14 do not affect current balance between the triacs very much. They are basically timing resistors. The current required to trigger D7 and D8 (the large triacs) is mostly a fixed value. R12 and R14 delay the start of the big triacs until the voltage of the power line is high enough to drive that much current through R12 and R14. Delaying the onset of the big triacs when the power voltage is near its zero crossing point has less effect than one might intuit.

The small triac is relieved of duty at the moment the large triac fires because there is only the voltage across the big triac being applied to R12 (R14), the small triac, and R13 (R15). Thus, the small triac has a small duty cycle.

These ideas were gathered with my oscilloscope at an earlier date.
 
Last edited:

Thread Starter

Dave Hooker

Joined Feb 18, 2015
11
This puzzles me. Are you saying the voltage delivered to the LED in the opto-coupler is 4.5V when off and 5V when on?

Your partial schematic does not show how the current flows in that circuit.

ps, 40 C is barely above the temperature of a person. This is not a problem for silicon, but heat sneaking in through the circuit board connectors seems to have been demonstrated in post #4.
The Humidifier/Dehumidifier Enable levels are +5V. The opto is switched "On" by a port o/p from a PIC going "Low" (Vce sat). Must admit I haven't checked the port configuration - trying to get my head around one thing at a time but appearing unprofessional.
 

Thread Starter

Dave Hooker

Joined Feb 18, 2015
11
May I remind you that R12 and R14 do not affect current balance between the triacs very much. They are basically timing resistors. The current required to trigger D7 and D8 (the large triacs) is mostly a fixed value. R12 and R14 delay the start of the big triacs until the voltage of the power line is high enough to drive that much current through R12 and R14. Delaying the onset of the big triacs when the power voltage is near its zero crossing point has less effect than one might intuit.

The small triac is relieved of duty at the moment the large triac fires because there is only the voltage across the big triac being applied to R12 (R14), the small triac, and R13 (R15). Thus, the small triac has a small duty cycle.

These ideas were gather with my oscilloscope at an earlier date.
Thanks, beginning to get the picture, now.
 

#12

Joined Nov 30, 2010
18,224
The opto is switched "On" by a port o/p from a PIC going "Low" (Vce sat).
The idea that a 10k resistor can pull a pin up by 1/2 of a volt demonstrates that the difference in current is less than 50 ua. The LED in the opto is not going to respond to 1/2 of a volt or 50 ua. I believe this is not your problem area.
 

#12

Joined Nov 30, 2010
18,224
Now that we have pondered the triacs, we can see that, "off" means the small triac has to endure the entire peak voltage of the power line. This might be your failure mode when hot. You have a 400 volt device holding back 340 volts at the peaks. Maybe it has failed. Try replacing it.
 

Thread Starter

Dave Hooker

Joined Feb 18, 2015
11
Now that we have pondered the triacs, we can see that, "off" means the small triac has to endure the entire peak voltage of the power line. This might be your failure mode when hot. You have a 400 volt device holding back 340 volts at the peaks. Maybe it has failed. Try replacing it.
Thanks
 
Top