I haven't looked at your truth tables, but since you came up with K-maps similar to the one I did, is say they seem okay...is the truth table done correct? is it only the kmaps not correct?
I haven't looked at your truth tables, but since you came up with K-maps similar to the one I did, is say they seem okay...is the truth table done correct? is it only the kmaps not correct?
One of the flaw in those counters is that they start at 1. Both slides say: start at 1, count to 5, 1->2->3->4->5->1.these slides i got from my lecturer notes
http://gyazo.com/3dcf4f8926d286196ee24042ac2fefc5
http://gyazo.com/143a910168fa50ec41c934b9481c7d2c
You should show the state transition take so we know what your reasoning is...here is the first 2 kmaps http://gyazo.com/6f97234feb92bd96f119daea185eac86
In a convoluted way, yes, however, the state table shows what the current count is and what the next count should be, that way, we can see what your input-forming logic should be to make that count. As is, you have the current count and the next count's input-forming logic, making us have to rework the logic to verify what you want. This takes time and requires us to pay attention to make sure you didn't make any mistakes.but i already link u the truth table, doesnt that show it?
Whichever you'd like; either way, you must be aware of the grouping requirements.oh ok so should i change to gray code or group these differently?
by Jake Hertz
by Aaron Carman
by Duane Benson
by Jake Hertz