Coil in an Antenna

Discussion in 'Wireless & RF Design' started by radiohead, Aug 14, 2012.

  1. radiohead

    Thread Starter Active Member

    May 28, 2009
    474
    31
    Everybody has seen the short antennae with the couple turns of a coil half-way up (like on a police car). I know this extends the electrical length of the antenna. Does anybody have, or know where to get the formula for calculating this? I've searched the ARRL Antenna Handbook but I couldn't find the reference.
     
  2. Papabravo

    Expert

    Feb 24, 2006
    10,144
    1,791
  3. t_n_k

    AAC Fanatic!

    Mar 6, 2009
    5,448
    782
  4. radiohead

    Thread Starter Active Member

    May 28, 2009
    474
    31
    Thank you for the links. I will look at both of them in-depth.
     
  5. TecknoTone

    New Member

    May 20, 2012
    21
    1
    There are those which work as a dual band 2m / 0.7m mobile antenna with a coil about a quarter of the way up from the base.
    I define mobile in the understanding that the vehicle body becomes part of the antenna system.
    I'd be grateful for a rounded description of this kind of operation.
     
  6. radiohead

    Thread Starter Active Member

    May 28, 2009
    474
    31
    so the coil can be 1/4, 1/2 or 3/4 up the antenna? Is the electrical length the same or does the positioning of the coil affect the SWR?
     
  7. t_n_k

    AAC Fanatic!

    Mar 6, 2009
    5,448
    782
    In a nutshell - It's not simple.

    Perhaps some numbers might prove helpful.

    I use an antenna simulation application called MMANA.

    I start with a bottom fed vertical dipole of 2.53 metres height above a 'real' ground. If this is a quarter wave dipole then the nominal operating frequency would be about 30MHz. Using MMANA I obtain a minimum VSWR [50 Ω] of 1.38 for this arrangement at 28.73MHz. The antenna impedance is 36.7+j3.3 Ω

    For interest, I now interpose a 2uH loading inductance at three different locations along the antenna.

    The three different locations I tried were 1/4, 1/2 & 3/4 the total length from the feed-point. For each situation I 'optimized' the VSWR by sweeping the frequency to find lowest VSWR and obtained the following results:

    Coil (2uH) at 1/4 the antenna length from feed-point:
    frequency=19.6 MHz and VSWR[50 Ω] = 2.9 [with antenna Z=17.4+j4 Ω]

    Coil (2uH) at 1/2 the antenna length from feed-point:
    frequency=21.8 MHz and VSWR[50 Ω] = 2 [with antenna Z=25.3+j4.25 Ω]

    Coil (2uH) at 3/4 the antenna length from feed-point:
    frequency=25.5 MHz and VSWR[50 Ω] = 1.5 [with antenna Z=33.7+j3.7 Ω]

    If I cross check these results with the loading software at the link I posted earlier [#3] I have the following results

    Since the applet uses imperial I first convert the 2.53 meters to 8.3 feet.

    • A midpoint coil of ~zero inductance with the frequency at 28.193 MHZ - for reference only.
    • A quarter way coil of 1.94uH at 19.6MHz [as obtained with MMANA above]
    • A half way (mid-point) coil of 1.82uH at 21.8 MHz [as obtained with MMANA above]
    • A three quarter way coil of 1.5uH at 25.5MHz [as obtained with MMANA above]
    So the applet suggests inductance values somewhat different but there is no indication in the applet as to what is actually optimized for those values [e.g. match / VSWR ..???].

    One important observation would be that the inclusion of the loading coil allows one to have a shorter antenna but without any subsequent matching techniques applied, the achievable VSWR suffers.

    I also noticed in the simulations that the inductively loaded antenna has a lower gain than its unloaded counterpart at 'optimized' VSWR at some frequency - 1dB say for the center loaded case.
     
    Last edited: Aug 16, 2012
Loading...