Good day Bill,I think anyone who understands theory can differentiate between deliberately harnessing power created for the purpose vs. trying to take advantage of what is out there. Lasers and Masers make concentrated beams for the purpose, instead of omnidirectional broadcasts where the inverse square law rules.
I hold no degrees, and I find the topic interesting. I have a thought about "theories".. As long as a theory remains unproven, then it's open for examination.
In discussing Tesla, and his experiments with transmission and recovery of power wirelessly, Tesla lived in a world un-swamped and uncluttered with transmissions from any source he himself did not create. In many metropolitan areas, we are drowning in a sea of RF, so much so that if we could put on a pair of glasses that was able to see those frequencies outside of our tiny visible spectrum, it would probably be worse than a foggy day in San Francisco...
So, my "theory" is that if most all available frequency radiation could be captured simultaneously - including that of electric motors, cell phones - excluding none, would the "inverse square law" still apply?
I understand how it does for light, however, the examples I have ever seen have to do with the visible spectrum... Or a single frequency of radio..
Thinking is my hobby - Tesla is a curiousity.. I have less credentials than Thomas Edison..
Thanks for your time... Bump the topic..
Last edited: