Hello all,
I previously tried asking for help on a different site and got virtually no answers, so I'm hesitant turning to another forum, but I'm not making any ground on my own so here goes. I hope I find some help here.
the background: I'm going to be reviewing PC power supplies for a web site. To do these reviews I need to be able to put a selectable load from 10% to 100% load, spread across multiple rails and multiple voltages, on power supplies that can reach (and sometimes exceed) 1500W.
I've looked at several options for a load and to buy the pro equipment I'd be looking at $1000's, up to possibly 20k, which I can't come near to affording. So after researching I've decided the best option is to build my own constant current load.....IF I can actually succeed in building it. I may also build multiples of them.
I'm not an electrical engineer so I'm probably missing some basic information but I've spent weeks researching, learning, and experimenting. I'm going to spare all the details of what I'm trying to set up and focus on one part at a time, one question at a time, as the last time I described my setup I got nothing but a lot of "if you're not an EE then you shouldn't be messing with that stuff cause it's over your head" flak and no answers, I also got a lot of, "why bother, just do it this way" type of responses where they spent more time typing to tell me why I shouldn't worry about learning than they would have if they just answered my questions.
Right now, I'm working with op-amps first. The short explanation to my problem is that I'm planning out a simple circuit, calculating the expected results, putting it on a breadboard and testing it, but not getting the calculated results or anywhere near them.
there's 4 components that I'm using here, an LM741 op-amp, various resistors, 9v batteries, and wires.
I've attached an image that I made on the previous forum per their request for a visual reference where I show 9 different configurations. I've tried all these and many many others. these are just general representations of what I used.
for the moment, I'm only wanting to reference attempt 7 and 8 cause I think those are the best examples of what I THINK my setup should look like to not have problems.
I also put the formula at the bottom cause that's the one basic piece of information that I need and in the case of this build, the Vout is really the only important factor and being able to accurately predict and control it. Also, I'd like to point out that on the setup used in attempt 7&8, I have set this up where I use a 100k pot in place of R2. (R1 is connected to Vout and R2 connected to the negative battery post) I've also set it up where I've used 2 batteries connected in series for my inputs (same as I'm using for the supply in the picture).
If we look at attempt 7 for example, and assume the voltage is exactly 9v for Vin, then my Vout SHOULD be 9.9V but I won't get that. I realize there's a saturation point that I could be hitting, that's why I started using the setup from 7&8 instead of 4,5,&6. But then I got into wondering if I was dealing with 18v difference or if I was only getting +9v and -9v, So I don't know if my saturation point in 7&8 should be 9v or 18v.
We can call that the first question right there:
in example 7 & 8, knowing that my Vout cannot exceed my Vs+, then is this Vs+ considered +9v or 18v?
Another change I've experimented with that isn't in the image has been using up to 4 batteries in series for a total of 36V and it hasn't changed my results. I thought that if the Vs+ was measured as the total voltage difference from vs- OR as only the positive side, I would get either 18v or 36v. The idea was that if by going to this setup to have the higher saturation point, I could first focus on being able to accurately calculate the inputs and outputs, then if that worked out, I could set up an input that could exceed 36v and see what I actually got, then I would know which point of view to take for my Vs+, but I digress.
even when connecting 4 batteries in series, with attempt 7 I would still not get 9.9. In the process of all my testing, I've used up some of the power in these batteries, so it's possible that they just aren't actually putting out enough power and/or my inexperience keeps me from being able to realize if the difference between the results and my calculations are a result of v-drop or other real-world physics that the math doesn't take into account. So I switched to using attempt 8.
with attempt 8, per my math, the Vout should be 99v. This is obviously beyond the saturation point so surely I'd see something above 9v here right? but even with the 4 battery series, I still don't get 18v or 36v. I'm still only getting around the 9v neighborhood.
Note:
last forum I asked questions on I was berated for not being specific and saying EXACTLY what voltage I got. I can't give an exact voltage because it wasn't the same every time. the batteries all look the same and I wasn't keeping track of how much time was on each, so they were all at different power levels. in reality I wasn't even getting a full 9v just testing the battery directly with a multimeter. it was usually something in the high 8's (8.76, 8.93, 8.67...) I realize when we're talking about an expected result of 9.9 and a reading of 9.5 (which the readings I got weren't even this close) then knowing exact decimal points is important, but that's also why I scaled up so that I should be seeing voltages in the 18 or 36v range, and when I was still getting readings in the 8v or 9v range I knew the gap was too large to be an issue of precision. So while I know that precision is important in electronics, in my case the lack of precision does not take away from the comprehension of the outcome, if I'm calculating that I should get 18v but I only get 9v, then that's enough information to know there is a problem with my calculations, my setup, or my measurements. There is no further information to gather from the technical facts that the input battery alone measured 8.93, the two supply batteries in series measured 17.58, and in attempt 8 I got a reading of 8.81.
I did look into the datasheet on the op-amp (again, this was an LM741 but I've also tried all of this with an LM324) and while I exceeded some thresholds, the were not to the point that there should have been damage. What that is to say is, there should be no malfunction in my op-amp, and even if the op-amp may have an output limit of, say 25V, (this is example just for making the point, I don't want to dig out the datasheet and give actual examples due to time it'd take to finish this post) that's higher than what I'm getting, so the fact that I'm not getting the results that I calculated I should is not a result of the limit of the op-amp.
The only other issue I can think of, is that maybe I'm not measuring properly. Maybe I'm connecting my multimeter to the wrong nodes. But I've tried to work around this when testing by measuring at several different points and while I can't rule it out, I doubt this is the problem. With that said though, if we look at attempt 8, I would set my positive probe in the positive battery post, and measure from the Vout pin and immediately after R1 ( Vin ), and after R2.....and sometimes this would get the same measurement in all spots, not every time though. I'd also try positive probe on the Vout pin and measure across R1 and also across R2. I'd try between R1 and R2 and measure to the negative post.....hopefully I'm painting a clear enough picture that I would take multiple readings and TRY to approach it with a logical method.
I know some people may have opinions on better ways to test power supplies, like resistor banks, or decade boxes, or light bulbs, or "reviews are for idiots." and that's fine but I'm not asking for work-arounds. Even if I don't build the constant current load that I'm attempting now, maybe a few years from now I'll want to try and do something completely different and new and need to understand op-amps at that point. My point is, I only pointed out my goal as background information, if anybody can and is willing to help, I'd be very appreciative of any assistance, but please can we only focus on the topics I'm bringing up and whatever information I need to understand them? I don't want/need a lecture on the decline of the journalistic profession and the moral depravity of contributing to its decay :/
I previously tried asking for help on a different site and got virtually no answers, so I'm hesitant turning to another forum, but I'm not making any ground on my own so here goes. I hope I find some help here.
the background: I'm going to be reviewing PC power supplies for a web site. To do these reviews I need to be able to put a selectable load from 10% to 100% load, spread across multiple rails and multiple voltages, on power supplies that can reach (and sometimes exceed) 1500W.
I've looked at several options for a load and to buy the pro equipment I'd be looking at $1000's, up to possibly 20k, which I can't come near to affording. So after researching I've decided the best option is to build my own constant current load.....IF I can actually succeed in building it. I may also build multiples of them.
I'm not an electrical engineer so I'm probably missing some basic information but I've spent weeks researching, learning, and experimenting. I'm going to spare all the details of what I'm trying to set up and focus on one part at a time, one question at a time, as the last time I described my setup I got nothing but a lot of "if you're not an EE then you shouldn't be messing with that stuff cause it's over your head" flak and no answers, I also got a lot of, "why bother, just do it this way" type of responses where they spent more time typing to tell me why I shouldn't worry about learning than they would have if they just answered my questions.
Right now, I'm working with op-amps first. The short explanation to my problem is that I'm planning out a simple circuit, calculating the expected results, putting it on a breadboard and testing it, but not getting the calculated results or anywhere near them.
there's 4 components that I'm using here, an LM741 op-amp, various resistors, 9v batteries, and wires.
I've attached an image that I made on the previous forum per their request for a visual reference where I show 9 different configurations. I've tried all these and many many others. these are just general representations of what I used.
for the moment, I'm only wanting to reference attempt 7 and 8 cause I think those are the best examples of what I THINK my setup should look like to not have problems.
I also put the formula at the bottom cause that's the one basic piece of information that I need and in the case of this build, the Vout is really the only important factor and being able to accurately predict and control it. Also, I'd like to point out that on the setup used in attempt 7&8, I have set this up where I use a 100k pot in place of R2. (R1 is connected to Vout and R2 connected to the negative battery post) I've also set it up where I've used 2 batteries connected in series for my inputs (same as I'm using for the supply in the picture).
If we look at attempt 7 for example, and assume the voltage is exactly 9v for Vin, then my Vout SHOULD be 9.9V but I won't get that. I realize there's a saturation point that I could be hitting, that's why I started using the setup from 7&8 instead of 4,5,&6. But then I got into wondering if I was dealing with 18v difference or if I was only getting +9v and -9v, So I don't know if my saturation point in 7&8 should be 9v or 18v.
We can call that the first question right there:
in example 7 & 8, knowing that my Vout cannot exceed my Vs+, then is this Vs+ considered +9v or 18v?
Another change I've experimented with that isn't in the image has been using up to 4 batteries in series for a total of 36V and it hasn't changed my results. I thought that if the Vs+ was measured as the total voltage difference from vs- OR as only the positive side, I would get either 18v or 36v. The idea was that if by going to this setup to have the higher saturation point, I could first focus on being able to accurately calculate the inputs and outputs, then if that worked out, I could set up an input that could exceed 36v and see what I actually got, then I would know which point of view to take for my Vs+, but I digress.
even when connecting 4 batteries in series, with attempt 7 I would still not get 9.9. In the process of all my testing, I've used up some of the power in these batteries, so it's possible that they just aren't actually putting out enough power and/or my inexperience keeps me from being able to realize if the difference between the results and my calculations are a result of v-drop or other real-world physics that the math doesn't take into account. So I switched to using attempt 8.
with attempt 8, per my math, the Vout should be 99v. This is obviously beyond the saturation point so surely I'd see something above 9v here right? but even with the 4 battery series, I still don't get 18v or 36v. I'm still only getting around the 9v neighborhood.
Note:
last forum I asked questions on I was berated for not being specific and saying EXACTLY what voltage I got. I can't give an exact voltage because it wasn't the same every time. the batteries all look the same and I wasn't keeping track of how much time was on each, so they were all at different power levels. in reality I wasn't even getting a full 9v just testing the battery directly with a multimeter. it was usually something in the high 8's (8.76, 8.93, 8.67...) I realize when we're talking about an expected result of 9.9 and a reading of 9.5 (which the readings I got weren't even this close) then knowing exact decimal points is important, but that's also why I scaled up so that I should be seeing voltages in the 18 or 36v range, and when I was still getting readings in the 8v or 9v range I knew the gap was too large to be an issue of precision. So while I know that precision is important in electronics, in my case the lack of precision does not take away from the comprehension of the outcome, if I'm calculating that I should get 18v but I only get 9v, then that's enough information to know there is a problem with my calculations, my setup, or my measurements. There is no further information to gather from the technical facts that the input battery alone measured 8.93, the two supply batteries in series measured 17.58, and in attempt 8 I got a reading of 8.81.
I did look into the datasheet on the op-amp (again, this was an LM741 but I've also tried all of this with an LM324) and while I exceeded some thresholds, the were not to the point that there should have been damage. What that is to say is, there should be no malfunction in my op-amp, and even if the op-amp may have an output limit of, say 25V, (this is example just for making the point, I don't want to dig out the datasheet and give actual examples due to time it'd take to finish this post) that's higher than what I'm getting, so the fact that I'm not getting the results that I calculated I should is not a result of the limit of the op-amp.
The only other issue I can think of, is that maybe I'm not measuring properly. Maybe I'm connecting my multimeter to the wrong nodes. But I've tried to work around this when testing by measuring at several different points and while I can't rule it out, I doubt this is the problem. With that said though, if we look at attempt 8, I would set my positive probe in the positive battery post, and measure from the Vout pin and immediately after R1 ( Vin ), and after R2.....and sometimes this would get the same measurement in all spots, not every time though. I'd also try positive probe on the Vout pin and measure across R1 and also across R2. I'd try between R1 and R2 and measure to the negative post.....hopefully I'm painting a clear enough picture that I would take multiple readings and TRY to approach it with a logical method.
I know some people may have opinions on better ways to test power supplies, like resistor banks, or decade boxes, or light bulbs, or "reviews are for idiots." and that's fine but I'm not asking for work-arounds. Even if I don't build the constant current load that I'm attempting now, maybe a few years from now I'll want to try and do something completely different and new and need to understand op-amps at that point. My point is, I only pointed out my goal as background information, if anybody can and is willing to help, I'd be very appreciative of any assistance, but please can we only focus on the topics I'm bringing up and whatever information I need to understand them? I don't want/need a lecture on the decline of the journalistic profession and the moral depravity of contributing to its decay :/
Attachments
-
183 KB Views: 50