Can a capacitor decouple into floating ground?

Discussion in 'General Electronics Chat' started by coinmaster, Oct 15, 2016.

  1. coinmaster

    Thread Starter Member

    Dec 24, 2015
    350
    6
    Can you decouple AC into a floating ground via a capacitor?
     
  2. nsaspook

    AAC Fanatic!

    Aug 27, 2009
    2,908
    2,168
    Describe your 'floating ground'. A circuit diagram would be nice.
     
  3. crutschow

    Expert

    Mar 14, 2008
    13,009
    3,233
    Not enough info.
     
  4. MrAl

    Well-Known Member

    Jun 17, 2014
    2,433
    490
    Hi,

    If i understand you right then the answer is either yes or no depending on what you need to decouple.
    That is because the AC part of the signal gets decoupled normally but any transients can cause large currents which can be objectionable.

    More information about what you want to decouple would be a good idea, but for now i assume you have one cap to decouple the signal and one cap to decouple the ground as in the following circuit:

    SIG IN o----C1-----o SIGNAL OUT
    GND IN o----C2----o GND OUT

    As you might expect, if the input GND is at a very different DC level than the GND OUT when power is first applied, there could be a large transient from GND in to GND out which can cause problems.
     
  5. coinmaster

    Thread Starter Member

    Dec 24, 2015
    350
    6
    I guess the short version of what I'm asking is can I bypass the voltage rating of a capacitor in a ripple filter by filtering into floating ground?
     
  6. crutschow

    Expert

    Mar 14, 2008
    13,009
    3,233
    Well, we've had the short version twice and we still don't know what you mean by a "floating ground".
    Floating from what?
    We need the long version of what you are asking or, better yet, a schematic.
     
  7. nsaspook

    AAC Fanatic!

    Aug 27, 2009
    2,908
    2,168
    I still unclear about the nature of this floating ground? In order for the bypass (or decoupling capacitor) function to work there must be a complete circuit of some sort so energy can move into that alternative (shunted through) usually low impedance path instead.
    http://www.designers-guide.org/Design/bypassing.pdf

    You can't (safely) bypass the voltage rating of an individual capacitor but you can arrange a circuit with multiple series capacitors to extend the voltage raging of the stack while keeping each individual capacitor within it's voltage rating.

    http://electronicdesign.com/compone...r-strings-overvoltage-yet-maintain-efficiency
     
  8. coinmaster

    Thread Starter Member

    Dec 24, 2015
    350
    6
    Well seeing how ltspice does't allow floating circuits I can't post a schematic. Not sure how I can explain it any more simply.
    Capacitors are used in power supplies to shunt ripple currents into ground. Capacitors have maximum voltage ratings. I'm asking if I connected the capacitor to a ground that is floating relative to the rest of the circuit will the ripple currents still be passed through to this floating ground without surpassing the voltage rating of the capacitor.

    I ask because I would like to use low voltage caps in high voltage supplies and it's always a challenge having to design around multi hundred dollar caps.

    The nature of floating electricity still escapes me since for example DHT floating filament currents can modulate audio currents and can create a voltage drop relative to earth even though it is not earth referenced, so much doesn't make sense with floating electricity. I'm hoping maybe capacitors can pass current into a floating ground even though there is no complete circuit.
     
  9. crutschow

    Expert

    Mar 14, 2008
    13,009
    3,233
    You can draw a circuit in LTspice without a ground reference, it just won't simulate properly, so please draw it and post it.

    There's nothing special about ground, it's just a reference node for voltages in a circuit, noting else.

    Certainly you can have a floating node from your reference ground, but then you can't use a voltage from that floating node circuit to power something that is referenced to your ground node and not back to you floating node (since then it's no longer floating).


    It boils down to, all currents have to have a complete path from the source and back to the source.
     
  10. coinmaster

    Thread Starter Member

    Dec 24, 2015
    350
    6
    floating cap transfer.png
    Ignore the values. The AC power sources signify the AC from the wall. Even though the bottom circuit is floating the current still returns to the wall through the transformer does it not?
     
  11. nsaspook

    AAC Fanatic!

    Aug 27, 2009
    2,908
    2,168
    This is where IMO you are going conceptually wrong (with it's origins in the water analogy). The currents don't flow into a ground reference point like water out of a facet never to be seen again or fill up a tub. The electric current behaves more like links in a bicycle chain that move in a closed loop to transport energy from source to load. The power supply ripple currents must have a closed loop to return to the their source for the shunt to work.
     
  12. nsaspook

    AAC Fanatic!

    Aug 27, 2009
    2,908
    2,168
    The only return path for C8 current would be in series to the very small L1:L2 transformer coupling capacitance or leakage currents. The Galvanic isolation breaks the current loop 'chain'.
     
    Last edited: Oct 15, 2016
    kubeek likes this.
  13. BR-549

    Well-Known Member

    Sep 22, 2013
    1,987
    388
    You should breadboard a low voltage proto. Then measure the voltage across the cap and also the current thru it.
     
  14. wayneh

    Expert

    Sep 9, 2010
    12,120
    3,046
    I agree. The L2 circuit could be at any voltage compared to the L1 side and it wouldn't matter. That's the beauty of isolation! The capacitor would change that relative voltage by a small ±∆V, and it still wouldn't matter to an ideal circuit.
     
  15. crutschow

    Expert

    Mar 14, 2008
    13,009
    3,233
    To summarize, there is no significant current through C8 and it has no effect on the circuit since there is no complete current path.
    You need to understand what NS said about current in post #11.
    Once you do, you will see why your circuit won't work as you wanted.
     
  16. ErnieM

    AAC Fanatic!

    Apr 24, 2011
    7,387
    1,605
    You absolutely cannot connect a cap from points A to C and expect it to filter from A to B.
     
  17. ronv

    AAC Fanatic!

    Nov 12, 2008
    3,290
    1,255
    The short answer is no.
    You can model it in spice by adding a 1 gig resistor to the bottom of each side of l1, L2.
     
  18. crutschow

    Expert

    Mar 14, 2008
    13,009
    3,233
    It does not.
    The longer answer is, the current does not "return to the wall"; any current going through the top of the secondary also comes out the bottom of the secondary.
    No significantly current goes from the secondary to the primary.
    In a normal power transformer the primary and secondary are two separate turns of wire and are galvanically isolated from each other.
    The only connection between the two is through magnetic coupling from the magnetic field in the core.
     
  19. coinmaster

    Thread Starter Member

    Dec 24, 2015
    350
    6
    What if I did this
    floating cap transfer 2.png
    That would give the transformer 100% leakage current while still maintaining floating isolation, maybe?
     
  20. nsaspook

    AAC Fanatic!

    Aug 27, 2009
    2,908
    2,168
    You are wasting yours and our time. The current path that actually allows C8 (or some equivalent total capacitance) to filter the ripple current from the positive side of the bridge needs to be directly connected to the negative side of the full-wave bridge to be effective.
     
Loading...