Buck Converter Design Thread

Discussion in 'The Projects Forum' started by jegues, Sep 10, 2013.

  1. jegues

    Thread Starter Well-Known Member

    Sep 13, 2010
    735
    43
    Buck Converter Design for PMDC Motor

    Introductory Notes: The design article followed in this post can be found here: http://my.ece.ucsb.edu/York/Bobsclass/194/References/NonIsolated/Buck/Buck%20Converter%20Design%20Demystified%20606PET25.pdf

    This circuit will be used for a motor controller.

    The batteries used to power the motor are Lithium Polymer batteries manufactured by GBS batteries. The batteries have sixteen 3.6V cells connected in series to have a rated voltage of 55V and a capacity of 60Ah.

    The motor is a permanent magnet brushed DC motor from Motenergy, model part number ME0708. The motor has a lead to lead resistance of 0.01Ω, and a lead to lead inductance of 0.055mH at 120Hz. The motor is rated for 48V and 100A, but can handle up to 300A for one minute, and has maximum peak torque of 37.8 Nm and maximum rotor speed of 5000rpm.

    This design will cover a particular stepdown regulator topology, that is, one with a fixed switching frequency, PWM and operation in CCM.

    Design

    Four design parameters are required:

    1. Input Voltage Range
    2. Regulated Output Voltage
    3. Maximum Output Current
    4. Switching Frequency
    The figure below illustrates the basic topology we will be using,

    [​IMG]

    For our design, the four main design parameters are as follows:

    1. 50V  < V_{in} < 55V
    2. V_{out} = 48V
    3. I_{outmax} = 300A
    4. f_{sw} = 20kHz
    Inductor Selection


    Calculating the inductor value is the most critical component when designing a stepdown switching converter.


    First we assume we are operating in CCM with ideal switches an ideal diode:


    L = (V_{inmax}-V_{out})*\frac{V_{out}}{V_{inmax}}*\frac{1}{f_{sw}}*\frac{1}{LIR*I_{outmax}}

    Where LIR is the inductor current ratio expressed as a percentage of Iout.

    The value of LIR represents a tradeoff between efficiency and load-transient response. An LIR = 0.3 represents a good trade off between the two.

    This gives an L = 3.39uH, therefore we select,

    \Rightarrow L = 3.3uH

    From this the peak inductor current can be calculated,

    I_{peak} = I_{outmax} + \frac{\Delta I_{L}}{2}, \text{ where}

    \Delta I_{L} = LIR * I_{outmax}

    This yields,

    \Rightarrow I_{peak} = 346.2A

    Thus, when selected an inductor we should select one with a slightly higher saturation-current rating. Let's use a 20% margin, yielding,

    \Rightarrow I_{sat} = 432A

    Also, to minimize power loss, an inductor with the lowest maximum DCR specification will be selected.

    Output Capacitor Selection

    Output capacitance is required to minimize the voltage overshoot and ripple present at the output of a stepdown converter.

    The problem of overshoot requires that the output capacitor is large enough to prevent stored inductor energy from launching the output above the specified maximum output voltage. Output voltage overshoot can be calculated using the following equation:

    \Delta V = \left(\sqrt{V_{out}^{2} * \frac{L(I_{outmax} + \frac{\Delta I_{L}}{2})^{2}}{C_{o}}}\right) - V_{out}

    Rearranging this equation yields,

    C_{o} = \frac{L \left( I_{outmax} + \frac{\Delta I_{L}}{2}  \right)^{2}}{\left( \Delta V + V_{out} \right)^{2} - V_{out}^{2}}

    If we allow for an output ripple that is 20% of the output voltage,

    \Delta V = 0.2 * V_{out} = 9.6V

    This yields an output capacitance of,

    \Rightarrow C_{o} = 390.33uF

    If we add the typical capacitor value tolerance to this (i.e. 20%) we get a practical value for the output capacitance of,

    C_{o} = 1.2 * 390.33uF = 468.4uF

    Therefore we select,

    \Rightarrow C_{o} = 470uF

    The resulting output ripple due to the capacitance alone is given by,

    V_{ripple:cap} = \frac{1}{2C_{o}}*\frac{(V_{inmax}  - V_{out})}{L} *  \left( \frac{V_{out}}{V_{inmax}} *\frac{1}{f_{sw}} \right)^{2} =  4.3V

    The ESR of the output capacitor dominates the output voltage ripple. The ammount can be calculated as follows:

    V_{ripple:ESR} = \Delta I_{L} *ESR_{C_{o}}

    Adding the two ripple component (i.e. capacitor and ESR) we find the total output voltage ripple for the buck converter:

    :eek:ut} = \frac{1}{2C_{o}}*\frac{(V_{inmax} - V_{out})}{L} * \left( \frac{V_{out}}{V_{inmax}} *\frac{1}{f_{sw}} \right)^{2} + \Delta I_{L} *ESR_{C_{o}} " alt="V_{ripple:eek:ut} = \frac{1}{2C_{o}}*\frac{(V_{inmax} - V_{out})}{L} * \left( \frac{V_{out}}{V_{inmax}} *\frac{1}{f_{sw}} \right)^{2} + \Delta I_{L} *ESR_{C_{o}} " />

    Rearranging this to solve for the ESR yields,

    :eek:ut} - \frac{1}{2C_{o}}*\frac{(V_{inmax} - V_{out})}{L} * \left( \frac{V_{out}}{V_{inmax}} *\frac{1}{f_{sw}} \right)^{2}\right)" alt="ESR_{C_{o}} = \frac{1}{\Delta I_{L}} * \left( V_{ripple:eek:ut} - \frac{1}{2C_{o}}*\frac{(V_{inmax} - V_{out})}{L} * \left( \frac{V_{out}}{V_{inmax}} *\frac{1}{f_{sw}} \right)^{2}\right)" />

    Thus using the desired output voltage ripple and the output capacitance value, one can calculate a maximum ESR. To achieve the desired output voltage ripple, we must select a capacitance with ESR lower than the one calculated above, with a capacitance greater or equal to 470uF.

    Input Capacitor Selection

    The input capacitors ripple rating dictates its value and size, and the following equation calculates how much ripple current the input capacitor must be able to handle:

    I_{ripple:C_{in}} = I_{outmax} \frac{ sqrt{ V_{out}(V_{inmin}-V_{out})}}{V_{inmin}}

    From this we calculate,

    \Rightarrow I_{ripple:C_{in}} = 58.8A

    The input capacitance required for a step down converter depends on the impedance of the input power source.

    For common laboratory power supplies, 10uF - 20uF of capacitance per ampere of output current is usually sufficient.

    So,

    C_{in} = I_{ripple:C_{in}} * 10uF = 587.88uF

    Select,

    \Rightarrow C_{in} = 570uF

    Diode Selection

    Power dissipation is the limiting factor when choosing a diode. The worst-case average power can be calculated as follows:

    P_{DIODE} = \left( 1 - \frac{V_{out}}{V_{inmax}} \right)*I_{outmax}*V_{D} = 26.73W

    Where it is assumed that, V_{D} = 0.7V

    Simulation

    After this design process I decided to try and simulate and simulate the resulting circuit to view the results. I decided to neglect the LC filter at the input for now and just focus on the buck converter portion of the circuit.

    Here is the link for the falstad circuit simulation: http://tinyurl.com/buckconverterdesignsimulation

    Click the link above and a java applet will run and open the circuit I've simulated.

    It appears as though I must have made some mistakes or overlooked certain things throughout the design process, as I did not obtain the results I was expecting.

    Questions


    1. Does anyone see anything I overlooked throughout my design, or any calculation errors? I'm trying to figure out why my design failed so miserably!
    2. What is the appropriate way to model the motor as my load? I only have information regarding Resistance L-L = 0.01Ω and its L-L Inductance at 120Hz is 0.0550mH.
    I have entered all of my design equations into a simple MathCAD program so changing the design parameters to obtain new results will take me very little time.

    Thanks for reading and thanks for all your help!
     
    Last edited: Sep 10, 2013
  2. ronv

    AAC Fanatic!

    Nov 12, 2008
    3,290
    1,255
    Why do you need a buck regulator? Just PWM the motor and set a current limit.
    I tried to build a motor model once for spice - no joy, so I usually model them as an inductor and change the resistance to see stall and some nominal current.
     
  3. THE_RB

    AAC Fanatic!

    Feb 11, 2008
    5,435
    1,305
    Agreed. It's a poor design for DC motor driving as you lose the low RPM torque advantages that you get with low frequency pulsed DC to the motor.

    Feeding the motor with a small, smooth DC voltage (from your buck circuit) will perform much worse in many applications.
     
Loading...