In the frequency domain circuit representation the current source is denoted by the polar form of the complex number - which is equivalent to the rectangular form via the standard polar to rectangular conversion. There's no ambiguity, whether you represent in either rectangular or polar. Both are equally valid. One normally knows what is implied in the context of the notation.I'm confused, in part a they said draw the frequency domain equivalent circuit shouldn't we write the current source as a complex number ?
For me frequency domain = phasors = complext numbers
A complete solution for the required voltage as a phasor should include both magnitude and phase angle - so why would you not include the phase angle [theta]? When you construct a phasor diagram don't you draw it with consideration to both individual phasor magnitudes and the relative phase displacements of the various phasor quantities shown in the diagram?In part b they ask find the phasor voltage but they give the answer in terms of theta. What am I missing ?
by Duane Benson
by Jake Hertz
by Jake Hertz