Anti-Laser

nsaspook

Joined Aug 27, 2009
13,079
are you suggesting that this technology is not new ? :confused:
I doubt it because of the amount of money spent on weapons countermeasures in the US on programs that are in black R&D.

With a nick like "Black-Bird" you should know that our black project guys had stealth jets in the 1950s. Stealth doesn’t just mean low radar cross section observability. It's everything from audio to x-rays.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_stealth
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_index_metamaterials
 
Last edited:

steveb

Joined Jul 3, 2008
2,436
I doubt it because of the amount of money spent on weapons countermeasures in the US on programs that are in black R&D.

With a nick like "Black-Bird" you should know that our black project guys had stealth jets in the 1950s. Stealth doesn’t just mean low radar cross section observability. It's everything from audio to x-rays.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_stealth
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_index_metamaterials
Interesting viewpoint. Any public claim of a technology development being new is never true because black projects already developed them. The nice thing about your opinion is that no one can prove you wrong. :p
 

nsaspook

Joined Aug 27, 2009
13,079
Interesting viewpoint. Any public claim of a technology development being new is never true because black projects already developed them. The nice thing about your opinion is that no one can prove you wrong. :p
This is true, but history is on my side about rediscovery of things long known by secret programs.

example...
The Alternative History of Public-Key Cryptography

http://cryptome.org/ukpk-alt.htm
 

Thread Starter

Black-Bird

Joined Jan 26, 2011
23
I doubt it because of the amount of money spent on weapons countermeasures in the US on programs that are in black R&D.

With a nick like "Black-Bird" you should know that our black project guys had stealth jets in the 1950s. Stealth doesn’t just mean low radar cross section observability. It's everything from audio to x-rays.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_stealth
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_index_metamaterials
interesting but you should know first that I live in the meddle east so there is no our here, don't be fooled by the name cupcake :cool:

by the way ,thanks for the contribution and the links :)
 

jpanhalt

Joined Jan 18, 2008
11,087
The F-117A is not classified as a bomber. The B2 is the only stealth bomber that we have (that we know about), and I did not recall one of them being shot down. John
 
Top