120 Volt D.C. and 5 or 10 Amp. Variable Power Supply

Thread Starter

anurag

Joined Aug 5, 2008
3
Hello members of allaboutcircuit.com forum.i am in urgent requirement of design of 120 Volt D.C. and 5 or 10 Amp. Variable (0 to 120V) Power Supply. but i couldnt figure out which components i should use for this , i searched various websites but i could not get anyone fulfilling the criteria.may i use multiple circuits of lm 317(or any other power ics) in series to get this higher voltage. i already have a 0 to 64volt Variable 5 Amp dual power supply and i test it with load by connecting both the supplies in series just like a cell or transformer it works well, i communicated to the customer service of the supplier of the power supply in this regard but they told that it is harmful, and any damage will not be considered in warranty, hence i stop the practise.kindly suggest your opinionThanksanurag
 

Tahmid

Joined Jul 2, 2008
343
Hi Anurag,

I think you want a linear variable power supply with 0-120v dc and 10A power rating. It is not very difficult but very tricky. For that, you require a large transformer (2000va rating minimum), one bridge rectifier-gbpc3506(35A, 600v) with huge heatsink, 15000uF 250v(minimum) and 1uF non polar 250v(minimum) capacitors, one lm317 with heatsink, 10 nos. mjl21194 (250v 16a 200w each) npn pass transistors, with huge heatsinks, to increase the current capability, a potentiometer, some decoupling capacitors, few resistors, optional led indicators etc. You must provide appropriate fuses at the input and output.
If you require the schematic, I can provide you.
Thanks.
 

SgtWookie

Joined Jul 17, 2007
22,230
An LM317 would not really be suitable for such high voltage. It's limited to 40V.
A Texas Instruments TL783 goes from 1.2v up to 125V out, 800mA. Power dissipation would be very high at low output voltages. You would need a huge heatsink.

Better to have a switching or buck/boost preregulator and a linear postregulator. You'd save a lot on your air conditioning bill.
 

Tahmid

Joined Jul 2, 2008
343
Hi Anurag,

In my mentioned circuit, LM 317 will be used only to trigger the pass transistors and to obtain the regulated voltage and hence it is safe and sound for your requirement. In LM 317 the input and output difference is 40v, not 0 to 40v. So, you can get your required voltage and amperage with the help of a LM317 and other parts as I have mentioned. I will provide you the circuit tomorrow. Linear circuit is easier to make in comparison with smps. So, you can try. You can try with TL783 also,which I did not use.
Thanks.
 

bloguetronica

Joined Apr 27, 2007
1,541
Hi Anurag,

In my mentioned circuit, LM 317 will be used only to trigger the pass transistors and to obtain the regulated voltage and hence it is safe and sound for your requirement. In LM 317 the input and output difference is 40v, not 0 to 40v. So, you can get your required voltage and amperage with the help of a LM317 and other parts as I have mentioned. I will provide you the circuit tomorrow. Linear circuit is easier to make in comparison with smps. So, you can try. You can try with TL783 also,which I did not use.
Thanks.
Well, the fact is that your LM317 still has to withstand more than 120V in order to regulate. The pass transistor works more like an emitter follower, and thus doesn't prevent the LM317 from burning. It is just not safe to submit a LM317 to a voltage greater than 40V, and I guess it will burn.

Plus, you still need a huge heatsink attached to your pass transistor, since your pass transistor is doing all the work. You have a better chance on controlling the voltage by the means of pulse with modulation, because a transistor in its active region dissipates a lot more heat than a transistor used as a switch. A switched-mode power supply would be your best bet, both in terms of cost, weight, volume and dissipated heat (and, of course, efficiency).

You can see the advantages of a switched-mode power supply, when compared to a linear one, on this wikipedia article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Switched-mode_power_supply
 

Tahmid

Joined Jul 2, 2008
343
Hi,
I actually don't use linear power supply. I made and use smps power supply. But making SMPS power supply is not easy and hence I put the suggestion to Anurag, whom I think a newcomer in this field.
LM 317 will not be burned as it will not consume more than few miliA current, just to trigger the pass transistors and almost all the current will pass through the pass transistors bypassing LM317 and as long as input output difference is 40 volt,LM317 is safe(with minimum current).
This is a suggestion and a practical one. One can try and learn valuable lesson. Regarding heat sink- linear curcuits require huge heatsink and anybody trying with linear power supply should cope up with it.

For Anurag,
I will provide the circuit as early as possible. You can try and if you are confident, you can try smps route also. Linear power supply is bulky, weighty, big with huge heatsink etc.and costly but very reliable and also more lasting than smps.

Thanks.
 

bloguetronica

Joined Apr 27, 2007
1,541
...
LM 317 will not be burned as it will not consume more than few miliA current, just to trigger the pass transistors and almost all the current will pass through the pass transistors bypassing LM317 and as long as input output difference is 40 volt,LM317 is safe(with minimum current).
...
Not burned because of excess of current, but because of voltage excess between the input and ground pins.
 

RmACK

Joined Nov 23, 2007
54
Let's see his schematic before criticising too harshly, he may have a clever way to ensure that the 40V rating is not exceeded. Hear the guy out he said the schematic would be up soon...
 

bloguetronica

Joined Apr 27, 2007
1,541
Let's see his schematic before criticising too harshly, he may have a clever way to ensure that the 40V rating is not exceeded. Hear the guy out he said the schematic would be up soon...
I'm only trying to help. It is not my intention to criticize.

Nevertheless, I agree with you. Lets wait and see!
 

Thread Starter

anurag

Joined Aug 5, 2008
3
hi friends thanks for your interest in my topic.

dear tahmid i m hopefull to u

linear power supply that can vary only from 90v to 120v of current rating 10A may work for me if it is difficult to design
previous requirement.

also i need to design a current controlled (14.4 Volt & 10A Max) lead-acid battery charger.

pls give your suggestions & ideas.

thanks
anurag
 
Last edited:
Hi,
I actually don't use linear power supply. I made and use smps power supply. But making SMPS power supply is not easy and hence I put the suggestion to Anurag, whom I think a newcomer in this field.
LM 317 will not be burned as it will not consume more than few miliA current, just to trigger the pass transistors and almost all the current will pass through the pass transistors bypassing LM317 and as long as input output difference is 40 volt,LM317 is safe(with minimum current).
This is a suggestion and a practical one. One can try and learn valuable lesson. Regarding heat sink- linear curcuits require huge heatsink and anybody trying with linear power supply should cope up with it.

For Anurag,
I will provide the circuit as early as possible. You can try and if you are confident, you can try smps route also. Linear power supply is bulky, weighty, big with huge heatsink etc.and costly but very reliable and also more lasting than smps.

Thanks.
I am willing to give it a try. I dont mind big and bulky. As you correctly said they are more durable. I need a dual supply 0 to approx 100v approx.
Can you please provide schematic.
 
Top