All About Circuits Forum Designing an active band pass filter at VHF
 User Name Remember Me? Password
 Register Blogs FAQ Members List Today's Posts Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 Notices Welcome to the All About Circuits forums.Our forum is a place where thousands of students, hobbyists and professionals from around the world share knowledge and ideas. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

 The Projects Forum Working on an electronics project and would like some suggestions, help or critiques? If you would like to comment or assist others with their projects, this is the place to do it.

#1
07-10-2010, 02:20 PM
 alex1234 New Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 7
Designing an active band pass filter at VHF

I am working on a mini project in which I have to design an active narrow band pass filter of 4th order (I chose butterworth filter because we need to avoid ripples and also have a steeper response, this is satisfied by butterworth as chebyshev gives ripples and Bessle's has linear slope.) which will work at 10MHz-30MHz,having a passband of 1MHz.
Also I have used uA741 which is included in PSPICE library.

This filter is supposed to be a variable (but that is to be done later.)
However I am stuck on first step, I used the basic formulas and got values of resistors. I had to make capacitor values low such that resistor values would be significant.

I was able to design sucessfully for center frequency on 1kHz,but the same method I guess doesnot work for 10-30MHz.
From this what I could think of is the capacitors(values in picofarads) change their characteristics at VHF.

Here is what I did for center frequency of 1kHz.(kindly see the attachment)

fc=center frequency.
A=Gain(Assumed A=1)
Q=Quality factor(Assumed Q=100)
C1=refer schematic.
C2=refer schematic.
Using same formulaes, I got the resistors for fenter frequency of 10MHz.
C1=C2=10pF.

R1=Q/(2∏*fc*C*A)=159.15kΩ
R1=Q/(2∏*fc*C*(2Q^2-A))=7.958Ω
R3=R4=Q/(∏*fc*C*A)=318.309kΩ

for attached images (sch.png=schematic for 1kHz cutoff, 1Khz.png=response of sch.png, and bfp.png=response for 10Mhz bpf_r1.png is schematic for 10Mhz)
Attached Images
 sch.png (38.8 KB, 36 views) bpf.PNG (36.7 KB, 26 views) 1Khz.png (62.1 KB, 22 views) bp_rf1.PNG (37.7 KB, 25 views)
#2
07-10-2010, 02:50 PM
 SgtWookie Expert Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: In the vast midwest of the USA; CST Posts: 22,038

For starters, the 741 opamp will be completely useless at those frequencies. You require a very fast opamp, as that's the only way you're going to get the bandwidth you need.

Look at current-feedback opamps. Video opamps are current feedback, and they operate happily in the 50MHz and up region. Look for an amp that's stable with Av=1 (a gain of 1)

Small ceramic capacitors do have parasitics, but until you're actually in RF territory, the parasitics are very slight. Anything below 20MHz is still basically DC.

You might look at using varactor diodes for tuning. If additional capacitance is required, you can use several varactor diodes in parallel.
__________________
General info:
If you have a question, please start a thread/topic. I do not provide gratis assistance via PM nor E-mail, as that would violate the intent of this Board, which is sharing knowledge ... and deprives you of other knowledgeable input.
#3
07-10-2010, 03:16 PM
 Bill_Marsden Super Moderator Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Dallas, TX (GMT-5 w/ DST) Posts: 19,042 Blog Entries: 5

The main purpose for active filters is to make filters that would normally require huge inductors. For high frequencies (I would define that as anything over 100Khz) a conventional LC filter works well. Active filters basically simulate LC filters with really large inductors.

The 741 op amp is almost useless for anything of 10Khz, and that is pushing it. At 10Khz it has a gain around 100 (unity at 1Mhz), and there are other op amp specs that affect frequency responses it is even worst at (I'm thinking of something called slew rate). It is good for DC (though there are much, much better parts) and for teaching op amps, where all those terrible specs are good learning opportunities.
__________________
..
"Good enough is enemy of the best." An old engineering saying, Author unknown.

General info:
If you have a question, please start a thread/topic. I do not provide gratis assistance via PM nor E-mail, as that would violate the intent of this Board, which is sharing knowledge ... and deprives you of other knowledgeable input. Thanks for the verbage Wookie.
#4
07-10-2010, 09:44 PM
 alex1234 New Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 7

First of all I am thankful to both of you because you took some time (and pain as well) to reply to my question.

I have replaced the ua741 by LMC6464.
It gives be good characteristics as a band pass filter, but is not exactly at 10MHz.

I tried nearly 60-80 opamps of high speed and large bandwidth, but I get absurd responses, the most common of them was some what similar to that of high-pass filter. Since i am just a beginner,i am unaware of the things that cause this. So if any one can enlighten me on this,it would be really very helpful.

Also, I want to ask whether the designing formulas change according to op amps.(In exams we have same procedure,and ua741 give tolerable characteristics to it.)

here is the new schematic and response.
Attached Images
 new1.png (33.3 KB, 17 views) new.png (38.3 KB, 14 views)
#5
07-10-2010, 11:59 PM
 SgtWookie Expert Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: In the vast midwest of the USA; CST Posts: 22,038

Did you remember to take into account the input and output parasitics of the opamp?

Look at a datasheet to see what they are.

Also keep in mind that opamps have propagation delays; what goes in one end doesn't come out the other end immediately.

Did you notice the load specifications in the datasheet?
__________________
General info:
If you have a question, please start a thread/topic. I do not provide gratis assistance via PM nor E-mail, as that would violate the intent of this Board, which is sharing knowledge ... and deprives you of other knowledgeable input.

Last edited by SgtWookie; 07-11-2010 at 12:06 AM.
#6
07-11-2010, 01:26 AM
 Bill_Marsden Super Moderator Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Dallas, TX (GMT-5 w/ DST) Posts: 19,042 Blog Entries: 5

Is this homework? You would be much better designing a LC filter followed by an amplifier (which would also provide excellent isolation).

You want a 4th order bandpass, adjustable 10Mhz to 30 Mhz with a pass band of 1Mhz.

I'll be honest, I don't think this can be done using active filters, which is why I mention conventional designs. Due to the wide range of adjustability I think it will be quite hard using conventional techniques too. You have a Q difference of X3 end to end with the problem as stated.

There are reasons while super heterodyne was invented, radios covering a band that wide have similar problems. So they figured out a way to drop the frequencies to a common IF, so the bandwidth stayed the same no matter what the receiver was set for.

What is your application?
__________________
..
"Good enough is enemy of the best." An old engineering saying, Author unknown.

General info:
If you have a question, please start a thread/topic. I do not provide gratis assistance via PM nor E-mail, as that would violate the intent of this Board, which is sharing knowledge ... and deprives you of other knowledgeable input. Thanks for the verbage Wookie.
#7
07-11-2010, 02:10 PM
 bertus Administrator Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Amsterdam,Holland (GMT + 1) Posts: 12,240

Hello,

If you want to design a filter for that frequency, you better use LC circuits.

By the way, 10 - 30 Mhz is still HF and not VHF, see the table:

Code:
```Very Low Frequency       VLF 3 kHz - 30 kHz
Low Frequency            LF  30 kHz - 300 kHz
Medium Frequency         MF  300 kHz - 3 MHz
High Frequency           HF  3 MHz - 30 MHz
Very High Frequency      VHF 30 MHz - 300 MHz
Ultra High Frequency     UHF 300 MHz - 3 GHz
Super High Frequency     SHF 3 GHz - 30 GHz
Extremely High Frequency EHF 30 GHz - 300 GHz```
Select All
Bertus
__________________
You don't have to know everything, if you know where to find it.
When you do ask questions, you may look stupid.
When you do NOT ask questions, you will STAY stupid.

It would be nice to have the Timezone ( GMT +/- x ) in the location field in the profile.
(User CP -> Edit Your Details)
#8
07-12-2010, 12:11 AM
 alex1234 New Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 7

Thank yu for all replies,and I agree that range is HF and not VHF.
Actually its a mini project. Every year we have one project for which we have 3 months to complete.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basically this band-pass filter would be connected to some oscillator which has tunable frequency.(Making this oscillator is some other person's job,not mine.)then this oscillator would be tuned to some frequency,and then bpf will show which freq its passing,by adjusting the center frequency.Thus this should be narrow bpf and should be tunable.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I took you suggestions on r-l-c filter, implemented it,but then if I try to increase the Q(quality factor),then the system oscillates(ζ<<1),this will make my bpf to be unstable.(which may be in range of Mhz, for Q=100,I get about 10MHz oscillation frequency. ) But then for Q=100 I get a very good response,and have to bother about less number of cascades.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I chose simple r-l-c parallel ckt.
I searched for a way for improvement in both Q and ζ,but I guess one has to make a compromise in between them.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I was very happy with my results from R-L-C circuits,unless my project manager told me that it should be an active filter.(I designed R-L-C ckts and got the response.)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
So again the same old story, This time I chose a higher side op amp which has current-feedback. that is OPA658(OPA658X/BB in PSPICE library.)
I chose the center frequency as 10MHz,C1=C2=100pF.
and using the formulas got R1=R2=159Ω R3=R4=318.3Ω

I included the source resistor of 50Ω(referred from data-sheet.)
But the graph is not matching to that of bpf.The slew-rate,and GBP matches perfectly as requirement,Its very wide band opamp and has a very high slew rate. I also took into the parasitic capacitances of the OPAMP. but nothing is improving in frequency response.
The schematic remains the same,just few things added here and there,like source resistance and load resistances.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have couple of questions now

1.What is better active filter or passive filters?

2.If passive filters can satisfy needs of the filter designer, then would it not be convinent to design a filter that is needed,and just connect a Instrumentation ampliier before it?

The instrumentation amp,will remove the noise and filter will do its job,then why is it,that many people go for active filter designing?
#9
07-12-2010, 12:41 AM
 Bill_Marsden Super Moderator Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Dallas, TX (GMT-5 w/ DST) Posts: 19,042 Blog Entries: 5

They are fairly equivalent, I've stated the reasons why active filters are used for audio and lower. You don't need a instrumentation amplifier, just a amp with good rejection between output an input, likely they will be sharing a ground (unless this is a design criteria).

The amplifier keeps the output impedance of the filter constant. This is critical for any non-active filter, a variable impedance or even if the impedance is off from calculated value can change the filter drastically. An active filter doesn't have this problem, because the output impedance is very close to 0Ω (part of the nature of op amps). Traditional designs usually add something like a 6db attenuator to get the output impedance as close to nominal as can be done, then add an amplifier.

I have a lot of experience in this field (I was a lead tech at Collins Radio), I have never heard of an active filter being used much over 1Mhz. I do have to a the cravat that this was over 10 years ago however, technology could have marched on without me.

One last thing, you have a conventional filter, it can take hours or even days to tune, and this assumes good test equipment. Some of the stuff I started using in the 70's was not very good, it did the job. The later stuff added equalizations that made the job much easier.
__________________
..
"Good enough is enemy of the best." An old engineering saying, Author unknown.

General info:
If you have a question, please start a thread/topic. I do not provide gratis assistance via PM nor E-mail, as that would violate the intent of this Board, which is sharing knowledge ... and deprives you of other knowledgeable input. Thanks for the verbage Wookie.
#10
07-18-2010, 01:04 PM
 alex1234 New Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 7

Thank you again.
Now I have a fairly fast opamp which can operate till 50MHz.
I have tried various topologies,but not able to decide which topology is best for this application(Very High Q).

I tried the following:
Akerberg-Mossberg.
Sallen-Key.
LeapFrog.
Fliege.
MFB.
KHN.
MB.

So can any one please suggest me the best topology that I could use for a very narrow band pass filter,another criteria is to make it programmable from 1MHz-50MHz.

 Tags active, band, designing, filter, pass, vhf

 Related Site Pages Section Title Worksheet Active filters Worksheet Passive filter circuits Textbook Resonant filters : Filters Textbook Band-stop filters : Filters Textbook Band-pass filters : Filters Video Lecture Op Amp Applications - Band-Pass & Band-Stop Filters - Op Amps and Op Amp Circuits Video Lecture Op Amp Applications - Active Filters - Op Amps and Op Amp Circuits Textbook High-pass filters : Filters Textbook Low-pass filters : Filters Textbook Asynchronous counters : Sequential Circuits Counters

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post ec2009 The Projects Forum 1 02-15-2010 09:18 PM whale General Electronics Chat 2 01-03-2010 02:05 PM TrevorP General Electronics Chat 3 12-27-2009 03:24 AM bull@dog Homework Help 4 05-31-2008 06:45 PM atferrari General Electronics Chat 8 07-22-2007 12:31 PM

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Electronics Forums     General Electronics Chat     The Projects Forum     Homework Help     Electronics Resources Software, Microcomputing, and Communications Forums     Programmer's Corner     Embedded Systems and Microcontrollers     Computing and Networks     Radio and Communications Circuits and Projects     The Completed Projects Collection Abstract Forums     Math     Physics     General Science All About Circuits Commmunity Forums     Off-Topic     The Flea Market     Feedback and Suggestions

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:48 AM.

User-posted content, unless source quoted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Public Domain License.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.