![]() |
|
|||||||
| Homework Help Stuck on a textbook question or coursework? Cramming for a test and need help understanding something? Post your questions and attempts here and let others help. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Please excuse my poorly drawn circuit. It has been in its current position for a long time, and at t=0 the switch is moved. I have to find the voltage of the capacitor and inductor at t=0, and the current of the inductor and capacitor at t=0, the voltage on the capacitor at t=infinity, and current on inductor at t=infinity. In other words, i need to find Vc(0), Ic(0), VL(0), IL(0), Vc(infinity), and IL(infinity). I'm pretty sure Vc(0)= 12V (equal to voltage across 4ohm resistor at t=0- since voltage cant change instantly in capacitors) and IL(0)= 3A (18V/(2+4), skip 5 ohm because L is treated as short circuit) If someone could tell me if those are right and how to get the rest that would be great, thanks!
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Your assumptions so far are correct.
![]() For VL(0): At the instant the switch opens, the inductor current will initially be unchanged - i.e. 3A. The capacitor voltage is 12V at this instant. The next step in reasoning becomes a little more complicated. If the 5 ohm were not there, the assumption would be that the inductor voltage would be zero at t=0. Since, the drop across the 2 ohm would be 2x3 = 6V, the capacitor voltage is 12V and V2ohm(0) + Vc(0) =18V - so VL(0) would be zero as V2ohm(0) + Vc(0) just balances the 18V source. But the 5 ohm is there, so does it have any effect at t=0? If a current I were flowing in the 5 ohm away from the source (left-to-right) at t=0, then the voltage drop across the 2 ohm would be greater than 6V which would be inconsistent with the assumption of a current flowing in that direction - VC(0) still being 12V. Conversely, if a current was flowing the other way (right-to-left) in the 5 ohm, then there would also be an inconsistency with the voltage drop across the 2 ohm being less than 6V. The only conclusion possible then is that the current in the 5 ohm at t=0 is zero and VL(0) is also zero. For Ic(0): Since the current in L is 3A and this same current can only flow into C at t=0 (with the switch now being open), then Ic(0)=3A. For t=∞: Current will flow into C until steady state conditions are again reached. Irrespective of the circuit damping (which is unknown but >0), the steady state voltage across C at t=∞ must be 18V. From that you should be able to deduce IL(∞) |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thank you so much for your help! I was taught that capacitors are to be treated as open circuits when they are fully charged, so at t=infinity, IL would be zero, since the circuit is incomplete, correct?
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I would argue that the capacitor steady state voltage just balances the source voltage and no further charge transfer (or current flow) can take place. |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| circuit, currents or voltages, rlc |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DC parallel RLC circuit. (Steady State) | NewGuy01 | General Electronics Chat | 2 | 08-09-2009 02:58 PM |
| Complex RLC circuit analysis | john williamsXT | Homework Help | 0 | 07-26-2009 05:56 PM |
| RLC circuit question | count_volta | General Electronics Chat | 66 | 06-23-2009 02:37 AM |
| Automatic Light Circuit For My Car | tonysticks | General Electronics Chat | 16 | 06-26-2008 08:29 PM |
| Basic Second Order Transient Circuit (RLC) | wiz0r | Homework Help | 3 | 05-04-2008 03:25 AM |