
Homework Help Stuck on a textbook question or coursework? Cramming for a test and need help understanding something? Post your questions and attempts here and let others help. 

Thread Tools  Display Modes 
#1




How to find the damping ratio of this transfer function
40K / s(s+3)(s+5)
How do i find the damping ratio and also the gain...K? thanks 
#3




i need help, which is why i am posting.
I can only get up to: 40k / s^3 + 3s^2 + + 15s + 40k 
#5




Quote:
This is a third order system. Before you try to solve this, ask yourself if you have a good level of understanding of a second order system. Do you fully understand second order systems and the classifications; underdamped, overdamped and criticallydamped? Do you know how to determine natural frequency and damping factor for a second order system? If you understand a second order system, then I'm sure you understand a first order system. Dealing with more complicated systems is a bit of an art. If you have poles and zeros, you can think about pole/zero cancelation, even if they are not perfectly matched in frequency. In other words a third order system with a pole and zero near each other, may act pretty much like a second order system without that pole/zero pair. The understanding of higher order systems, (like your example) with no zeros present, is made easier if it can be viewed as a combination of first and/or second order systems. A third order system will have 3 poles. If these poles are separated by a large frequency, then write the transfer function as the multiplication of three separate first order systems. If two poles are near each other, with the other far away, then write the transfer function as the multiplication of a first order system with a second order system. If all poles are near each other, then it's much harder to understand the system behavior. But if you have two complex conjugate poles, then you can view this as an underdamped response and define a natural frequency and damping ratio for those two poles as if they are a second order system. I believe you are dealing with this last case. In general, the system gain can be found when you normalize the first and second order system in the usual ways. A single poles system will be normalized with unity gain at zero frequency. The second order system is normalized to have unity gain at the natural frequency. Any gain factor left over can be called the gain factor K. However, gain is frequency dependent, so you could define the gain in other ways, such as; DC gain, high frequency gain, maximum gain etc. It's kind of arbitrary and based on whatever definition you find useful. It's possible to get into a debate over the exact definition of damping ratio for a third order system like this. Is it simply the damping ratio of the second order portion of the system? Or, is it possible to define a more encompassing damping factor (which includes the effect of all poles) based on the way the full system response decays over time? I think both are possible and useful to consider. However, I don't know which you (or your teacher) are considering. Last edited by steveb; 05242009 at 03:54 PM. 
The Following User Says Thank You to steveb For This Useful Post:  
supermankid (05152014) 
#6




I do understand second order system but as this is a third it is different.
the open loop transfer function is attached. 
#7




Quote:
Referring to the feedback that you show in the figure,  is it positive or negative feedback? The diagram shows a summing node with no indication of positive or negative signs. This usually means all inputs are added, but your total transfer function is only correct if the feed back is negative. EDIT: Sorry, hgmjr is right, the first transfer function is not correct with either positive or negative feedback assumed. Last edited by steveb; 05242009 at 05:30 PM. 
#8




If you take a look at the material at this link you should be able to spot the flaw in your interpretation of the expression for the transfer function in your original post.
hgmjr POSTSCRIPT: Steveb's point about the need for the inclusion of the correct polarity signs on the arrows is also important. You do need to include the polarity marks on your diagram for it to be complete. Last edited by hgmjr; 05242009 at 05:33 PM. Reason: Added postcript comment. 
#9




yes steveb it is useful. thanks
Quote:
As for the negative or positive. the postive sign is on at the top and negative on the lower. thanks for your keep responses guys 
#10




Quote:
The link by hgmjr appears to be what you need. He was smart enough to see what the original question is really asking. I missed it. Basically, the gain factor K they want is the maximum value of K that results in a stable system. 
Tags 
damping, function, ratio, transfer 
Related Site Pages  
Section  Title  
Worksheet  Nonlinear opamp circuits  
Worksheet  Linear computational circuitry  
Worksheet  Summer and subtractor opamp circuits  
Worksheet  Inverting and noninverting opamp voltage amplifier circuits  
Worksheet  Negative feedback opamp circuits  
Worksheet  Class A BJT amplifiers  
Textbook  Tesla polyphase induction motors : Ac Motors  
Worksheet  AC power  
Worksheet  Resonance  
Textbook  Decibels : Amplifiers And Active Devices 
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Butterworth filter transfer function calculation  mentaaal  General Electronics Chat  9  03272009 04:54 PM 
How to find the transfer function of a filter  skumar.31dec  General Electronics Chat  3  03122009 11:12 PM 
Laplace transfer function question  Vanush  Homework Help  1  10022008 01:35 PM 
Transfer Function Problem  cheyenne  Homework Help  1  03282008 08:28 PM 
Finding the transfer function...  snowfox  Homework Help  14  11152007 07:21 PM 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

