All About Circuits Forum  

Go Back   All About Circuits Forum > Abstract Forums > Math

Notices

Math Discussion forum for anything math related.

Reply   Post New Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-22-2012, 10:19 PM
steveb steveb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New England, USA
Posts: 2,431
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by amilton542 View Post
The video is called 'Einstein's Big Idea' which is a breakdown of scientific breakthroughs leading upto his famous formula ...

However, the chapter '2 is for squared' and the work Émilie du Châtelet did makes my problem more clear.

Steveb I would be grateful if you could view this ten minute chapter of the video and explain in more detail.

The chapter '2 is for squared' begins at 54:36 and goes on for approximately ten minutes.
Thanks for posting the video. I watched the whole thing and found it educational, interesting and entertaining. I especially enjoyed seeing my heros (Faraday, Maxwell and Einstein) come to life.

I'm not sure of what to say about that section of the video, but I can make an attempt as follows.

My best interpretation is that we need to realize that Newton and the scientists of his day did not have our perspective on Newton's laws of mechanics. There is no doubt that Newton fully understood his own laws, but how these laws interface with all other physics that we know today is something that he could not know about. In a sense, he invented the first reasonably complete theory of mechanics, and it was difficult to link this theory with other areas of science. He had no knowledge of theories of relativity, quantum mechanics and electrodynamics, nor did he live to see the Hamiltonian and Lagrangian formulations of his own laws. Hence, the fact that Newton and Leibniz might not see eye-to-eye on the importance of kinetic energy versus momentum is perhaps not too surprising.

We now readily think about and understand the concept of energy. We know that for the many experiments energy is conserved and mass is conserved independently. We also know that other experiments can show that mass and energy can be converted and are in a sense different forms of the same thing.

Apparently, Newton did not think from the same point of view, even though his laws of mechanics had the concept of energy embedded within them without doubt. Is seems Newton viewed momentum (mv) as the more important quantity of interest, while Leibniz recognized kinetic energy (mv^2/2 or mv^2 or anything proportional to v^2) as an important characteristic of a body. In some sense this comes down to semantics. Newton was not really saying that mv is energy, but most likely was just saying that mv is important to consider when looking at interactions. In reality both are equally important, so maybe the video is giving a biased view of what the debate is about. Fundamentally, momentum and energy are both conserved and are both important quantities to consider. Indeed, modern relativity theory links both of these into one 4-vector indicating that our perception of these quantities depends on our frame of reference.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to steveb For This Useful Post:
amilton542 (03-23-2012)
  #12  
Old 03-23-2012, 12:23 AM
amilton542 amilton542 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 392
Default

@ Steveb

Thank you for your generous interpretation. Me, myself, also enjoyed the video and I now fancy the actor who played Émilie du Châtelet.

As a reward for my gratitude, you will recieve new bedsheets of your named 'heros' through the post in the next few days.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-25-2012, 07:14 PM
panic mode's Avatar
panic mode panic mode is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Posts: 1,095
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by K7GUH View Post
OK, guys, now that you're squared away, how do you explain the formula for the volume of a sphere?
it is actually very simple, in fact you get formula for any shape - using calculus.
the key idea is to divide object into many small pieces and 'count them up'.
the smaller the pieces (use limit), the more accurate sum. this is what integrals are - sums when 'pieces' are infinitely small.

area is square function, volume is cubic... cube of side a has volume a^3 etc. there may be some other scaling factors involved (like 4pi/3) but ultimately volume is cubic (in volume equation for sphere it is r^3).
Reply With Quote
Reply   Post New Thread

Tags
,


Related Site Pages
Section Title
Worksheet Calculus for electric circuits


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Square wave triggers shorter square wave shaqywacky The Projects Forum 45 01-19-2011 12:19 AM
Bandwidth of square wave EngIntoHW Homework Help 2 10-01-2010 03:51 AM
Square wave inversion help gaganaut The Projects Forum 2 06-01-2010 03:41 AM
Square pulse, Duty cycle and odd/even harmonics. Antoniog2 General Electronics Chat 2 05-03-2010 06:09 PM
Sine Wave to TTL / Square Wave Circuit JohnIV General Electronics Chat 14 04-18-2010 10:57 PM

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:25 AM.


User-posted content, unless source quoted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Public Domain License.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.