If you are trying to operate a circuit at high speed and things are not going well, then it is a good idea to slow the circuit down (when possible) and see if things improve. This is not always possible. However, if it can be done, it will help to diagnose a lot of potential problem areas, such as parasitic inductance and capacitance.SgtWookie, is it better to get the smaller trigger frequency for the circuit?..
Correct.for PPM and PWM output, they are varied on the position and width of pulse but not the amplitude.
The amplitude of the pulses does not change.from the simulation software, development hardware part and refer to LM555 data sheet, the amplitude of pulse are increase...how this can happen?
The voltage amplitude of the pulses can be increased with an amplifier or with a digital level-change converter circuit.how can be the output of PPM and PWM amplified?
The output voltage is shown on the datasheet of an LM555. It is about 13.5V p-p when its supply is 15V and the load current is zero. It drops when loaded.im using LM555 for this both circuit, PPM and PWM... is it LM555 will amplify the their output?
Correct.just for my confirmation, when the value of potentiometer increase the width of pulse will also increase...is it right
The width of the monostable pulse stays the same when the input frequency is raised. But the pulse appears to be wider because the total time period becomes less.i have found that when im increasing the frequency from function generator, the width of pulse from A1 also increase..
but, when im doing the simulation, the width of pulse remain constant even im increase the frequency..
can anybody let me know which one is the right concept?..
the hardware output or simulation output?